From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752202Ab2KSL6P (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:58:15 -0500 Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:55990 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751799Ab2KSL6N (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:58:13 -0500 From: Chris Ball To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type References: <1352896551-17948-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <87haon99py.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> <20121119092725.GA553@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:58:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121119092725.GA553@gmail.com> (Lee Jones's message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:27:25 +0000") Message-ID: <87mwydhkj8.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Nov 19 2012, Lee Jones wrote: >> > There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities >> > are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them >> > to elevate any confusion. >> >> I think you meant "eliminate" here. :) Thanks, > > No, I meant alleviate. :) > > Do you want me to re-submit, or have you fixed up? I already pushed with a change to "eliminate" -- I'll leave it like that if that's okay. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:58:03 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type In-Reply-To: <20121119092725.GA553@gmail.com> (Lee Jones's message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:27:25 +0000") References: <1352896551-17948-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <87haon99py.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> <20121119092725.GA553@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87mwydhkj8.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Mon, Nov 19 2012, Lee Jones wrote: >> > There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities >> > are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them >> > to elevate any confusion. >> >> I think you meant "eliminate" here. :) Thanks, > > No, I meant alleviate. :) > > Do you want me to re-submit, or have you fixed up? I already pushed with a change to "eliminate" -- I'll leave it like that if that's okay. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child