From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Graham Murray Subject: Re: iptables-1.3.7 Requires ip_tables to be built as module Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:21:58 +0000 Message-ID: <87mz3ia5ex.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> References: <936822.57379.qm@web53605.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmurray.org.uk; s=in200507; t=1171351318; bh=Otjr/eZOWZswko754gWoQOReB+s=; h=Received: X-Authentication-Warning:From:To:Subject:References:X-Hashcash: Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=A sqNh9GL56Bz0uOIghDoKVk2z7JzhTSDaYcIfsB9/wuNMYT59RuxKDrd1Vzcbcl8GH9r ErfFrC1ik5vWsXkDVg== In-Reply-To: <936822.57379.qm@web53605.mail.yahoo.com> (Harvey Muller's message of "Mon\, 12 Feb 2007 11\:49\:12 -0800 \(PST\)") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Harvey Muller writes: > Graham, > > Assuming you've built ip_tables into the kernel (not as a module), > then I'd be interested in learning the difference in the process you > used to install iptables between versions 1.3.5 and 1.3.7. Version > 1.3.5 works fine for me with kernel version 2.6.20 built in (not as > a module). But when I use the same install process for 1.3.7, I get > the error messages. And when I go back and configure ip_tables as a > module, then the error message goes away, which is what one would > expect. No difference at all. They are both built using the 'standard' Gentoo ebuild system. In the kernel config I have both CONFIG_IP_NF_IPTABLES=y and CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES=y, as well as all the targets set to yes, all the parts of netfilter which I use are built into the kernel, none are built as modules.