From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps.thesusis.net (vps.thesusis.net [34.202.238.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B11639849 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 22:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=thesusis.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=thesusis.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: by vps.thesusis.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02882149C52; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:08:32 -0500 (EST) From: Phillip Susi To: Christian =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=B6nig?= , Dave Airlie , Linux regressions mailing list Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Luben Tuikov , "amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Alex Deucher , Christian =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=B6nig?= Subject: Re: Radeon regression in 6.6 kernel In-Reply-To: References: <87edgv4x3i.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> <559d0fa5-953a-4a97-b03b-5eb1287c83d8@leemhuis.info> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:08:32 -0500 Message-ID: <87o7fojcwv.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Christian K=C3=B6nig writes: > Well none of the commits mentioned can affect radeon in any way. Radeon=20 > simply doesn't use the scheduler. > > My suspicion is that the user is actually using amdgpu instead of=20 > radeon. The switch potentially occurred accidentally, for example by=20 > compiling amdgpu support for SI/CIK. Indeed, the lspci I originally posted does indicate amdgpu. What is the difference and should I switch it? If so, how? > Those amdgpu problems for older ASIC have already been worked on and=20 > should be fixed by now. I just pulled v6.7-rc2 and it's still broken. I'll see if I can revert those 3 patches. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58230C2BB3F for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 22:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5BF10E1B9; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 22:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps.thesusis.net (vps.thesusis.net [34.202.238.73]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F42910E1B9 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 22:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vps.thesusis.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02882149C52; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:08:32 -0500 (EST) From: Phillip Susi To: Christian =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=B6nig?= , Dave Airlie , Linux regressions mailing list Subject: Re: Radeon regression in 6.6 kernel In-Reply-To: References: <87edgv4x3i.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> <559d0fa5-953a-4a97-b03b-5eb1287c83d8@leemhuis.info> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:08:32 -0500 Message-ID: <87o7fojcwv.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Luben Tuikov , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Alex Deucher , Christian =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=B6nig?= Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" Christian K=C3=B6nig writes: > Well none of the commits mentioned can affect radeon in any way. Radeon=20 > simply doesn't use the scheduler. > > My suspicion is that the user is actually using amdgpu instead of=20 > radeon. The switch potentially occurred accidentally, for example by=20 > compiling amdgpu support for SI/CIK. Indeed, the lspci I originally posted does indicate amdgpu. What is the difference and should I switch it? If so, how? > Those amdgpu problems for older ASIC have already been worked on and=20 > should be fixed by now. I just pulled v6.7-rc2 and it's still broken. I'll see if I can revert those 3 patches.