All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Polish ilk+ wm register bits
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:29:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8373xzz.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220211090629.15555-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, 11 Feb 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Use REG_GENMASK() & co. for ilk+ watermarm registers.

*watermark

>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h               | 41 +++++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c               | 57 +++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index f4de004d470f..b219e162f1d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int i915_sr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9)
>  		/* no global SR status; inspect per-plane WM */;
>  	else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
> -		sr_enabled = intel_de_read(dev_priv, WM1_LP_ILK) & WM1_LP_SR_EN;
> +		sr_enabled = intel_de_read(dev_priv, WM1_LP_ILK) & WM_LP_ENABLE;
>  	else if (IS_I965GM(dev_priv) || IS_G4X(dev_priv) ||
>  		 IS_I945G(dev_priv) || IS_I945GM(dev_priv))
>  		sr_enabled = intel_de_read(dev_priv, FW_BLC_SELF) & FW_BLC_SELF_EN;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 278c9cbc6f3c..0dd4d34e7cd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4298,33 +4298,32 @@
>  #define _WM0_PIPEC_IVB		0x45200
>  #define WM0_PIPE_ILK(pipe)	_MMIO_PIPE3((pipe), _WM0_PIPEA_ILK, \
>  					    _WM0_PIPEB_ILK, _WM0_PIPEC_IVB)
> -#define  WM0_PIPE_PLANE_MASK	(0xffff << 16)
> -#define  WM0_PIPE_PLANE_SHIFT	16
> -#define  WM0_PIPE_SPRITE_MASK	(0xff << 8)
> -#define  WM0_PIPE_SPRITE_SHIFT	8
> -#define  WM0_PIPE_CURSOR_MASK	(0xff)
> +#define  WM0_PIPE_PRIMARY_MASK	REG_GENMASK(23, 16)

Should be (31,16) to match current WM0_PIPE_PLANE_MASK.

I didn't try to find the bspec, but if this is an intentional fix,
should be split out to a separate patch.

Other than that,

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

> +#define  WM0_PIPE_SPRITE_MASK	REG_GENMASK(15, 8)
> +#define  WM0_PIPE_CURSOR_MASK	REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
> +#define  WM0_PIPE_PRIMARY(x)	REG_FIELD_PREP(WM0_PIPE_PRIMARY_MASK, (x))
> +#define  WM0_PIPE_SPRITE(x)	REG_FIELD_PREP(WM0_PIPE_SPRITE_MASK, (x))
> +#define  WM0_PIPE_CURSOR(x)	REG_FIELD_PREP(WM0_PIPE_CURSOR_MASK, (x))
>  #define WM1_LP_ILK		_MMIO(0x45108)
> -#define  WM1_LP_SR_EN		(1 << 31)
> -#define  WM1_LP_LATENCY_SHIFT	24
> -#define  WM1_LP_LATENCY_MASK	(0x7f << 24)
> -#define  WM1_LP_FBC_MASK	(0xf << 20)
> -#define  WM1_LP_FBC_SHIFT	20
> -#define  WM1_LP_FBC_SHIFT_BDW	19
> -#define  WM1_LP_SR_MASK		(0x7ff << 8)
> -#define  WM1_LP_SR_SHIFT	8
> -#define  WM1_LP_CURSOR_MASK	(0xff)
>  #define WM2_LP_ILK		_MMIO(0x4510c)
> -#define  WM2_LP_EN		(1 << 31)
>  #define WM3_LP_ILK		_MMIO(0x45110)
> -#define  WM3_LP_EN		(1 << 31)
> +#define  WM_LP_ENABLE		REG_BIT(31)
> +#define  WM_LP_LATENCY_MASK	REG_GENMASK(30, 24)
> +#define  WM_LP_FBC_MASK_BDW	REG_GENMASK(23, 19)
> +#define  WM_LP_FBC_MASK_ILK	REG_GENMASK(23, 20)
> +#define  WM_LP_PRIMARY_MASK	REG_GENMASK(18, 8)
> +#define  WM_LP_CURSOR_MASK	REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define  WM_LP_LATENCY(x)	REG_FIELD_PREP(WM_LP_LATENCY_MASK, (x))
> +#define  WM_LP_FBC_BDW(x)	REG_FIELD_PREP(WM_LP_FBC_MASK_BDW, (x))
> +#define  WM_LP_FBC_ILK(x)	REG_FIELD_PREP(WM_LP_FBC_MASK_ILK, (x))
> +#define  WM_LP_PRIMARY(x)	REG_FIELD_PREP(WM_LP_PRIMARY_MASK, (x))
> +#define  WM_LP_CURSOR(x)	REG_FIELD_PREP(WM_LP_CURSOR_MASK, (x))
>  #define WM1S_LP_ILK		_MMIO(0x45120)
>  #define WM2S_LP_IVB		_MMIO(0x45124)
>  #define WM3S_LP_IVB		_MMIO(0x45128)
> -#define  WM1S_LP_EN		(1 << 31)
> -
> -#define HSW_WM_LP_VAL(lat, fbc, pri, cur) \
> -	(WM3_LP_EN | ((lat) << WM1_LP_LATENCY_SHIFT) | \
> -	 ((fbc) << WM1_LP_FBC_SHIFT) | ((pri) << WM1_LP_SR_SHIFT) | (cur))
> +#define  WM_LP_SPRITE_ENABLE	REG_BIT(31) /* ilk/snb WM1S only */
> +#define  WM_LP_SPRITE_MASK	REG_GENMASK(10, 0)
> +#define  WM_LP_SPRITE(x)	REG_FIELD_PREP(WM_LP_SPRITE_MASK, (x))
>  
>  /* Memory latency timer register */
>  #define MLTR_ILK		_MMIO(0x11222)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 605944551e1b..9382284134e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3409,29 +3409,28 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_results(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		 * disabled. Doing otherwise could cause underruns.
>  		 */
>  		results->wm_lp[wm_lp - 1] =
> -			(ilk_wm_lp_latency(dev_priv, level) << WM1_LP_LATENCY_SHIFT) |
> -			(r->pri_val << WM1_LP_SR_SHIFT) |
> -			r->cur_val;
> +			WM_LP_LATENCY(ilk_wm_lp_latency(dev_priv, level)) |
> +			WM_LP_PRIMARY(r->pri_val) |
> +			WM_LP_CURSOR(r->cur_val);
>  
>  		if (r->enable)
> -			results->wm_lp[wm_lp - 1] |= WM1_LP_SR_EN;
> +			results->wm_lp[wm_lp - 1] |= WM_LP_ENABLE;
>  
>  		if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
> -			results->wm_lp[wm_lp - 1] |=
> -				r->fbc_val << WM1_LP_FBC_SHIFT_BDW;
> +			results->wm_lp[wm_lp - 1] |= WM_LP_FBC_BDW(r->fbc_val);
>  		else
> -			results->wm_lp[wm_lp - 1] |=
> -				r->fbc_val << WM1_LP_FBC_SHIFT;
> +			results->wm_lp[wm_lp - 1] |= WM_LP_FBC_ILK(r->fbc_val);
> +
> +		results->wm_lp_spr[wm_lp - 1] = WM_LP_SPRITE(r->spr_val);
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * Always set WM1S_LP_EN when spr_val != 0, even if the
> +		 * Always set WM_LP_SPRITE_EN when spr_val != 0, even if the
>  		 * level is disabled. Doing otherwise could cause underruns.
>  		 */
>  		if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) <= 6 && r->spr_val) {
>  			drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, wm_lp != 1);
> -			results->wm_lp_spr[wm_lp - 1] = WM1S_LP_EN | r->spr_val;
> -		} else
> -			results->wm_lp_spr[wm_lp - 1] = r->spr_val;
> +			results->wm_lp_spr[wm_lp - 1] |= WM_LP_SPRITE_ENABLE;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/* LP0 register values */
> @@ -3444,9 +3443,9 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_results(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			continue;
>  
>  		results->wm_pipe[pipe] =
> -			(r->pri_val << WM0_PIPE_PLANE_SHIFT) |
> -			(r->spr_val << WM0_PIPE_SPRITE_SHIFT) |
> -			r->cur_val;
> +			WM0_PIPE_PRIMARY(r->pri_val) |
> +			WM0_PIPE_SPRITE(r->spr_val) |
> +			WM0_PIPE_CURSOR(r->cur_val);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -3538,24 +3537,24 @@ static bool _ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	struct ilk_wm_values *previous = &dev_priv->wm.hw;
>  	bool changed = false;
>  
> -	if (dirty & WM_DIRTY_LP(3) && previous->wm_lp[2] & WM1_LP_SR_EN) {
> -		previous->wm_lp[2] &= ~WM1_LP_SR_EN;
> +	if (dirty & WM_DIRTY_LP(3) && previous->wm_lp[2] & WM_LP_ENABLE) {
> +		previous->wm_lp[2] &= ~WM_LP_ENABLE;
>  		intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, WM3_LP_ILK, previous->wm_lp[2]);
>  		changed = true;
>  	}
> -	if (dirty & WM_DIRTY_LP(2) && previous->wm_lp[1] & WM1_LP_SR_EN) {
> -		previous->wm_lp[1] &= ~WM1_LP_SR_EN;
> +	if (dirty & WM_DIRTY_LP(2) && previous->wm_lp[1] & WM_LP_ENABLE) {
> +		previous->wm_lp[1] &= ~WM_LP_ENABLE;
>  		intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, WM2_LP_ILK, previous->wm_lp[1]);
>  		changed = true;
>  	}
> -	if (dirty & WM_DIRTY_LP(1) && previous->wm_lp[0] & WM1_LP_SR_EN) {
> -		previous->wm_lp[0] &= ~WM1_LP_SR_EN;
> +	if (dirty & WM_DIRTY_LP(1) && previous->wm_lp[0] & WM_LP_ENABLE) {
> +		previous->wm_lp[0] &= ~WM_LP_ENABLE;
>  		intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, WM1_LP_ILK, previous->wm_lp[0]);
>  		changed = true;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Don't touch WM1S_LP_EN here.
> +	 * Don't touch WM_LP_SPRITE_ENABLE here.
>  	 * Doing so could cause underruns.
>  	 */
>  
> @@ -6803,9 +6802,9 @@ static void ilk_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  		 * multiple pipes are active.
>  		 */
>  		active->wm[0].enable = true;
> -		active->wm[0].pri_val = (tmp & WM0_PIPE_PLANE_MASK) >> WM0_PIPE_PLANE_SHIFT;
> -		active->wm[0].spr_val = (tmp & WM0_PIPE_SPRITE_MASK) >> WM0_PIPE_SPRITE_SHIFT;
> -		active->wm[0].cur_val = tmp & WM0_PIPE_CURSOR_MASK;
> +		active->wm[0].pri_val = REG_FIELD_GET(WM0_PIPE_PRIMARY_MASK, tmp);
> +		active->wm[0].spr_val = REG_FIELD_GET(WM0_PIPE_SPRITE_MASK, tmp);
> +		active->wm[0].cur_val = REG_FIELD_GET(WM0_PIPE_CURSOR_MASK, tmp);
>  	} else {
>  		int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv);
>  
> @@ -7229,12 +7228,12 @@ void vlv_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   */
>  static void ilk_init_lp_watermarks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, WM3_LP_ILK, intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, WM3_LP_ILK) & ~WM1_LP_SR_EN);
> -	intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, WM2_LP_ILK, intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, WM2_LP_ILK) & ~WM1_LP_SR_EN);
> -	intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, WM1_LP_ILK, intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, WM1_LP_ILK) & ~WM1_LP_SR_EN);
> +	intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, WM3_LP_ILK, intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, WM3_LP_ILK) & ~WM_LP_ENABLE);
> +	intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, WM2_LP_ILK, intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, WM2_LP_ILK) & ~WM_LP_ENABLE);
> +	intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, WM1_LP_ILK, intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, WM1_LP_ILK) & ~WM_LP_ENABLE);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Don't touch WM1S_LP_EN here.
> +	 * Don't touch WM_LP_SPRITE_ENABLE here.
>  	 * Doing so could cause underruns.
>  	 */
>  }

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-16 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-11  9:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Move intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes() & co. out Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:30   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce intel_arm_planes_on_crtc() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:38   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 12:44     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 12:57       ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Introduce scaled_planes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:39   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Use {active, scaled}_planes to compute ilk watermarks Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:39   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Remove gen6_check_mch_setup() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:54   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 10:09     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Add REG_GENMASK64() and REG_FIELD_GET64() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 18:20   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:57     ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 17:58   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:58     ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:58   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:58     ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:59   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:59     ` kernel test robot
2022-02-16 10:12   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Polish ilk+ wm register bits Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 10:29   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-02-16 10:40     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-11 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups Patchwork
2022-02-11 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-11 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups (rev2) Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-11 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o8373xzz.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.