From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8193DC4338F for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 23:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6C8460F45 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 23:57:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org E6C8460F45 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=renesas.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64CBC170C; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 01:56:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 64CBC170C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1628035024; bh=kjTOFWyusu3kZK0x+oksmVUiWj2L2VGIwzJYkTBsX8s=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=bIxpafhxVTEL7qoLiJgrYuYW4P6C+VctETpxNi2WTUk1kPz9mPE5lBTvBjZu5yYki jcfZKYg39h3EewVkO2imsKAcwCdF2IrxQyDv09I0YdHmzFs1IslEdTfL2szroyaLpj bWp1SiDafRTqO4a/1L0Oo3n3u/OleN8YFu/5xER0= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8830F8016D; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 01:56:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id C7E09F802E8; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 01:56:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relmlie6.idc.renesas.com (relmlor2.renesas.com [210.160.252.172]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79368F8014D for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 01:56:04 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 79368F8014D X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,292,1620658800"; d="scan'208";a="89713141" Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir5.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.151]) by relmlie6.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2021 08:55:58 +0900 Received: from mercury.renesas.com (unknown [10.166.252.133]) by relmlir5.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B529F400F787; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 08:55:58 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:55:58 +0900 Message-ID: <87o8aeulpt.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> From: Kuninori Morimoto To: Mark Brown , robh+dt@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] ASoC: test-component: add Test Component for Sound debug/test In-Reply-To: <20210803170817.GP4668@sirena.org.uk> References: <87a6mhwyqn.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <877dhlwyoz.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20210803170817.GP4668@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Linux-ALSA X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" Hi Mark, Rob Thank you for your feedback > > for example, > > test-cpu : silent Component, silent DAI > > test-cpu-vn : verbose Component, silent DAI > > test-cpu-nv : silent Component, verbose DAI > > test-cpu-vv : verbose Component, verbose DAI > > Should these be runtime rather than binding options? Or at least > properties rather than something that's part of the compatible. It > doesn't feel right to have flags like that in the compatible at any > rate, and if we're making fixed DTs for test purposes (eg, to run in > qemu as part of a testsuite) it's no more difficult to use properties. > > I'm not sure if Rob has thoughts on the base concept of such virtual for > test bindings but they do seem like something that might be useful. I'm assuming that "verbose" version will be used for test/debug purpose, and it is needed for boot-time too. Thus, switching it runtime is unfortunately not good. I'm OK to use flag property for it if DT rule/maintainer was OK. Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto