From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1CAC47083 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DF4613E9 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229726AbhFBUj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:39:27 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:58928 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229697AbhFBUj0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:39:26 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1loXcT-00GZgP-5U; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 14:37:41 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=email.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1loXcR-00Efry-DT; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 14:37:40 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Andrew Morton Cc: legion@kernel.org, LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux Containers , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christian Brauner , Jann Horn , Jens Axboe , Kees Cook , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov References: <20210509181205.f0ce806919858efa0e0e0d20@linux-foundation.org> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 15:37:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210509181205.f0ce806919858efa0e0e0d20@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Sun, 9 May 2021 18:12:05 -0700") Message-ID: <87o8coq9yr.fsf@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1loXcR-00Efry-DT;;;mid=<87o8coq9yr.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX181tofntvStz1+pRqA2mAhl7FTynzngIXM= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Count rlimits in each user namespace X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton writes: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:27:07 +0200 legion@kernel.org wrote: > >> These patches are for binding the rlimit counters to a user in user namespace. > > It's at v11 and no there has been no acking or reviewing activity? Or > have you not been tracking these? Most of the reviews were noticing things that needed to be changed. For the ack/review by tags I am the one reviewing it and merging the change so I guess I didn't give Alex any Acked-by or Reviewed-by tags. Regardless the changes are sitting in linux-next now and seem to be doing fine. Eric From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30671C47093 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2650613DA for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:37:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C2650613DA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2B4496B0036; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:37:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 263906B006C; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:37:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1047D6B0070; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:37:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0038.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.38]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF64A6B0036 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:37:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7512BAC17 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:37:44 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78209944848.11.F9E66EF Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6396000153 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1loXcT-00GZgP-5U; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 14:37:41 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=email.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1loXcR-00Efry-DT; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 14:37:40 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Andrew Morton Cc: legion@kernel.org, LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux Containers , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christian Brauner , Jann Horn , Jens Axboe , Kees Cook , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov References: <20210509181205.f0ce806919858efa0e0e0d20@linux-foundation.org> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 15:37:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210509181205.f0ce806919858efa0e0e0d20@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Sun, 9 May 2021 18:12:05 -0700") Message-ID: <87o8coq9yr.fsf@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1loXcR-00Efry-DT;;;mid=<87o8coq9yr.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX181tofntvStz1+pRqA2mAhl7FTynzngIXM= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Count rlimits in each user namespace X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2F6396000153 Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=xmission.com; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of ebiederm@xmission.com designates 166.70.13.233 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ebiederm@xmission.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Stat-Signature: 61koap1971wdsxm6zxmejjz1imi9ndbk X-HE-Tag: 1622666256-977180 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Andrew Morton writes: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:27:07 +0200 legion@kernel.org wrote: > >> These patches are for binding the rlimit counters to a user in user namespace. > > It's at v11 and no there has been no acking or reviewing activity? Or > have you not been tracking these? Most of the reviews were noticing things that needed to be changed. For the ack/review by tags I am the one reviewing it and merging the change so I guess I didn't give Alex any Acked-by or Reviewed-by tags. Regardless the changes are sitting in linux-next now and seem to be doing fine. Eric