From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A150C433DB for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C561164DDC for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:18:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C561164DDC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=axtens.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dmqxm2mfnz3dF3 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:18:20 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=axtens.net header.i=@axtens.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=ghrXi5gN; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=axtens.net (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::430; helo=mail-pf1-x430.google.com; envelope-from=dja@axtens.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=axtens.net header.i=@axtens.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=ghrXi5gN; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DmqxJ19rmz3ckn for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:17:53 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id 201so4833921pfw.5 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:17:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=axtens.net; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=W+X1NbDzxQcXAdef3rzLvGa/2poksE2eT2ediy7X7vA=; b=ghrXi5gNNW9zIo806gaf+OA4fcu5QDp6g4H3TUMlpX8DvgJgPt+I/r+zU7x8+6Iznq r3BciTivQuDlQ9fV/3TaC8mAzJyWB3xXzdEfxqspumZ4yPCv039T8XkTzr8VOY1lwcVZ qIH8gzVBRQQxLkCn4JX9HWIcnOJWHLM4gBDbY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=W+X1NbDzxQcXAdef3rzLvGa/2poksE2eT2ediy7X7vA=; b=iPbUUekityhA89RNHgvnHxHBbt3ki4NtzF5Q12LXohzKY5vuZaSALgiJkYLm0kOZBN y/0D34ZCx9eXotUj7/xtckaaaknl7GXVaDUluaKZF5SNDnz8H7w7BjwuEt7JIvXXl0Ru Hog6halq8EoRlBMj1pt6sTozZdu0twKF6uggK/OH7ZN6nk6LMh4a9b5SvU+Vuylyz4GD wYFhsCz73r6ZDCFkyvJCsNwxwyvApege7GBZaAS9/M20uR+4zG2z2yFRBHEh8E+ZRivs 2ZYTIoCacbB+z22ZcCZX94RD/5owuf4Qm22G+pHOuy0DsSt0W0eYz5ESpGva0ajXXvGY 37Sw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gffoD5CPZR/JplW+kBwhZ/C/zPt6JNLffsVPlNqeR44QCo0rp DTdX1t/xiaoD4uXIk0C+nvwTUjZnj4DJ/A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAsjqZaVjPFO30xjlEIe1loyEfCA8l5DUUb7VjffwKPwfTWRs2KjSeP7fs2XakUEqPoBS2lw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9d9b:0:b029:1ed:6c08:b93c with SMTP id f27-20020aa79d9b0000b02901ed6c08b93cmr285127pfq.37.1614298670430; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:17:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (2001-44b8-111e-5c00-0af1-7e55-275a-1dc8.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:111e:5c00:af1:7e55:275a:1dc8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c18sm6538766pgm.88.2021.02.25.16.17.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:17:50 -0800 (PST) From: Daniel Axtens To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/8] powerpc/purgatory: drop .machine specifier In-Reply-To: <20210225155836.GG28121@gate.crashing.org> References: <20210225031006.1204774-1-dja@axtens.net> <20210225031006.1204774-8-dja@axtens.net> <20210225155836.GG28121@gate.crashing.org> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:17:47 +1100 Message-ID: <87o8g7of6c.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, llvmlinux@lists.linuxfoundation.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Segher Boessenkool writes: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 02:10:05PM +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote: >> It's ignored by future versions of llvm's integrated assembler (by not -11). >> I'm not sure what it does for us in gas. > > It enables all insns that exist on 620 (the first 64-bit PowerPC CPU). > >> --- a/arch/powerpc/purgatory/trampoline_64.S >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/purgatory/trampoline_64.S >> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ >> #include >> #include >> >> - .machine ppc64 >> +//upgrade clang, gets ignored .machine ppc64 > > Why delete it if it is ignored? Why add a cryptic comment? Sorry, poor form on my part. I think I will give up on having llvm-11 work and target llvm HEAD, which means I can drop this. > > > Segher