From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tglx@linutronix.de>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Do we need this list anymore? (was Re: [PATCH] Raffle 0)
In-Reply-To: <20200714110011.GA1300507@kroah.com>
References: <5f0cf7c5.1c69fb81.99805.3f5fSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
 <20200714055735.GB655193@kroah.com>
 <676ec4fc-b0df-91a6-92af-46c6c51663ed@citrix.com>
 <20200714110011.GA1300507@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:34:48 +0200
Message-ID: <87o8oiun3b.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: speck@linutronix.de
List-ID: <speck.linutronix.de>

speck for Greg KH <speck@linutronix.de> writes:
> Ok, that's something new, can we just tear down this list now and if we
> need new lists, create them as we have documented in:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.html
>
> That way, when we create a new list, we know what it is for, there's a
> set time limit on it, and no one is confused like this patch caused.
>
> We are already doing this for other issues happening, why shouldn't we
> do it for this one as well?

I'm happy to shut this thing down.