All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] timekeeping: Introduce fast accessor to clock tai
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 10:17:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pml3x7mv.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220426175338.3807ca4f@gandalf.local.home>

On Tue, Apr 26 2022 at 17:53, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * ktime_get_tai_fast_ns - NMI safe and fast access to tai clock.
>> + *
>> + * The same limitations as described for ktime_get_boot_fast_ns() apply. The
>> + * mono time and the TAI offset are not read atomically which may yield wrong
>> + * readouts. However, an update of the TAI offset is an rare event e.g., caused
>> + * by settime or adjtimex with an offset. The user of this function has to deal
>> + * with the possibility of wrong timestamps in post processing.
>> + */
>> +u64 notrace ktime_get_tai_fast_ns(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
>> +
>> +	return (ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() + ktime_to_ns(data_race(tk->offs_tai)));
>
> As you are using this for tracing, can you open code the
> ktime_get_mono_fast_ns(), otherwise we need to mark that function as
> notrace.

which we should do anyway....

kernel/trace/trace.c:   { ktime_get_mono_fast_ns,       "mono", 1 },

> Not to mention, this is a fast path and using the noinline of
> __ktime_get_fast_ns() should be less overhead.
>
> That said, I hit this too:
>
>             less-5071    [000] d.h2. 498087876.351330: do_raw_spin_trylock <-_raw_spin_lock
>             less-5071    [000] d.h4. 498087876.351334: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>             less-5071    [000] d.h5. 498087876.351334: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>             less-5071    [000] d.h3. 498087876.351334: rcu_read_lock_sched_held <-lock_acquired
>             less-5071    [000] d.h5. 498087876.351337: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h7. 1651009380.982749: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h7. 1651009380.982749: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h5. 1651009380.982749: rcu_read_lock_held_common <-rcu_read_lock_sched_held
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h7. 498087876.375905: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h7. 498087876.375905: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h5. 498087876.375905: update_cfs_group <-task_tick_fair
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h7. 498087876.375909: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>
> The clock seems to be toggling between 1651009380 and 498087876 causing the
> ftrace ring buffer to shutdown (it doesn't allow for time to go backwards).

That does not make sense. offs_tai changes only when clock is set via
adjtimex() or settimeofday().

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-27  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-14  9:18 [PATCH v2 0/3] tracing: Introduce trace clock tai Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-14  9:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] timekeeping: Introduce fast accessor to " Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-14 14:59   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-18 17:15     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-14 15:01   ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-26 21:53   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27  8:17     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-04-27  8:38     ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-27 15:27       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27 17:22         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27 19:23           ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27 20:06         ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-27 20:08           ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27 20:42         ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-27 21:05           ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27 21:12           ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-14  9:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tracing: Introduce trace " Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-14  9:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] tracing: Add documentation for " Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-14 11:27   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-04-14 11:38     ` Kurt Kanzenbach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pml3x7mv.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.