From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D247AC433B4 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932F6613D0 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:07:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 932F6613D0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46990 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk4sA-0006D1-NF for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:07:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk4r1-00049t-Go for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]:41833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk4qx-0001RT-E8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:15 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id d11so20993010wrw.8 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 06:06:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lSguVo/SiniPd/Dc3gbriaZ9Yhb83Bmle01IQxzetTM=; b=UAdz3ovD3g3vFyNDB8O7mfcglQnWFG1pc153qqUCZi+aSvKBgtu0PmzxzOBzSL1K+S JrzbB6oc/LEVjZOeoXjw4W2flOKkSHtjMRiwKEQbC6n2nlCpD4QjRErkylrlTs96SZpx W7/4wZum7/bnSMJCSGIJHwyb7S55k9RDFBe6Zk2GGDhyVeQJ0t/jTRO/KaIFps5ZIn7y zfp0bEqazEua73RCzJ9kiPf0VGLSKX0MEnm9nmEEDl5HdnN10NJMvfYRz2ZPAgDBJk4B WmPdfCSFCkQxL5ckwp5lc3eRWB5TQ9hmJHeev2bWeZo9i0zB0RNq1HK8ivQEFYJlimsA NzjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lSguVo/SiniPd/Dc3gbriaZ9Yhb83Bmle01IQxzetTM=; b=XWOXey6TXkMMd0+N+yn5eZs6SzzxLTeSQTJTS5wb8CFHXs6+IvZ2FRotqF5FC4xym6 ofdtrUuMe7rAj77qms4m4+vcqvpHd2+stRd9wau0YAXlYnY6QNQ0A0Ze6jllYxzuT8AO H04bn4/hIONmNfofwyWjEPnrepAIHL79KIcrMfX0DRNOeVxSsz8Np60MkHd60LdFU+aM qqK9LNwWBXARUtHI/lXwdWYdT25/zhCR9901q4q9BQTEtm5fHZsteiM6+7z6qVdcVNos Y2SuBLZXhQ7ScildghlDO6LIj+nhIt4GIrilBN5DLULFzZRCb63h8hx4fKMDkTOsvXlZ InCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oROsK+q1zocQhEfioSCZHIuZXpuMfKNPJi7xtoz38T1LE6sJv 5f95/xQy6TP0Tx6dN38/ZlhgaQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxggiGSk9MBl6fVD3QN7XAxgbKzHPFtsjqn09TOIueQDxYFAHk0FVIKO0V98aeu92Tk4du7lw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fc44:: with SMTP id e4mr9542213wrs.23.1621602369954; Fri, 21 May 2021 06:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r5sm2084211wrw.96.2021.05.21.06.06.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 May 2021 06:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1941FF7E; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:06:08 +0100 (BST) References: <20210520195322.205691-1-willianr@redhat.com> <20210520195322.205691-2-willianr@redhat.com> <0f4a1c6c-ddba-ae57-2d55-f59c478dc9c5@redhat.com> <943fcdae-168a-adf8-c82b-b1a88369441c@redhat.com> <82f5ed3f-3047-bfa3-c7b2-d91300f393f8@redhat.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.5.13; emacs 28.0.50 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] acceptance tests: rename acceptance to system Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 14:05:35 +0100 In-reply-to: <82f5ed3f-3047-bfa3-c7b2-d91300f393f8@redhat.com> Message-ID: <87pmxkb5j3.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::436; envelope-from=alex.bennee@linaro.org; helo=mail-wr1-x436.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Niek Linnenbank , qemu-arm , Michael Rolnik , Willian Rampazzo , Cleber Rosa , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Dau?= =?utf-8?Q?d=C3=A9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Thomas Huth writes: > On 21/05/2021 14.28, Willian Rampazzo wrote: >> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:16 AM Thomas Huth wrote: > [...] >>> Alternatively, what about renaming the "acceptance" tests to "validatio= n" >>> instead? That word does not have a duplicated definition in the context= of >>> QEMU yet, so I think it would be less confusing. >> While at the beginning of your reply, I started thinking if >> "validation" would cause less confusion for the QEMU project. Although >> validation testing is a broader concept inside the Verification & >> Validation process, encompassing unit testing, functional testing, >> integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing, it may be >> an option for the QEMU project. >> While system testing would be the correct terminology to use, if it >> causes more confusion, using a less strict terminology, like >> validation testing, is valid, in my opinion. > > > Or we could come up with a new, artificial name instead (like > "qtests"). It certainly need a "q" in the name. For example what > about: > > - avoqado > - valiqation > - aqueptance > - inteqration make check-quixotic? > > ? > > > Thomas --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e