All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: QMP introspecting device props common to a bus type
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:56:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmz5at1v.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YG23ILea4H36TllU@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:44:00 +0100")

Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:

> When introspecting properties for devices, libvirt issues a sequence of
> QMP  'device-list-properties' commands, one for each device type we
> need info for.  The result of this command tells us about all properties
> possible on that specific device, which is generally just fine.
>
> Every now and then though, there are properties that are inherited from
> / defined by the parent class, usually props that are common to all
> devices attached to a given bus type.
>
> The current case in point is the "acpi-index" property that was added to
> the "PCI" bus type, that is a parent for any type that is a PCI dev.
>
> Generally when libvirt adds support for a property, it will enable it
> across all devices that can support the property. So we're enabling use
> of "acpi-index" across all PCI devices.
>
> The question thus becomes how should we probe for existence of the
> "acpi-index" property. The qemu-system-x86_64 emulator has somewhere
> around 150 user creatable PCI devices according to "-device help".
>
> The existance of a class hierarchy is explicitly not exposed in QMP
> because we consider that an internal impl detail, so we can't just
> query "acpi-index" on the "PCI" parent type. 

Not true.

qapi/qom.json:

    ##
    # @ObjectTypeInfo:
    #
    # This structure describes a search result from @qom-list-types
    #
    # @name: the type name found in the search
    #
    # @abstract: the type is abstract and can't be directly instantiated.
    #            Omitted if false. (since 2.10)
    #
    # @parent: Name of parent type, if any (since 2.10)
    #
    # Since: 1.1
    ##
    { 'struct': 'ObjectTypeInfo',
      'data': { 'name': 'str', '*abstract': 'bool', '*parent': 'str' } }

    ##
    # @qom-list-types:
    #
    # This command will return a list of types given search parameters
    #
    # @implements: if specified, only return types that implement this type name
    #
    # @abstract: if true, include abstract types in the results
    #
    # Returns: a list of @ObjectTypeInfo or an empty list if no results are found
    #
    # Since: 1.1
    ##
    { 'command': 'qom-list-types',
      'data': { '*implements': 'str', '*abstract': 'bool' },
      'returns': [ 'ObjectTypeInfo' ],
      'allow-preconfig': true }

Example 1:

    {"execute": "qom-list-types", "arguments": {"abstract": true}}

returns all type names with their parent type names.

The following script prints a QOM type forest:

    #!/usr/bin/python3

    true = True
    false = False
    ts = ... output of the qom-list-types above ...
    child={}

    for t in ts:
        n = t['name']
        p = t.get('parent')
        if p not in child:
            child[p] = []
        child[p].append(n)

    def print_type_tree(name, level=-1):
        if name is not None:
            print(" " * level * 4 + name)
        for c in child.get(name, []):
            print_type_tree(c, level + 1)

    print_type_tree(None)

Example 2:

    {"execute": "qom-list-types", "arguments": {"implements": "pci-device"}}

returns all the (concrete) PCI device type names.

Note that "implements" may be an interface, too.

> We certainly don't want to issue 'device-list-properties' over and
> over for all 147 devices.
>
> If we just pick one device type, say virtio-blk-pci, and query that
> for "acpi-index", then our code is fragile because anyone can make
> a QEMU build that compiles-out a specific device. This is fairly
> unlikely for virtio devices, but never say never.
>
> For PCI, i'm tending towards probing for the "acpi-index" property on
> both "pci-bridge" and "pcie-root-port", as it seems unlikely that both
> of those will be compiled out of QEMU while still retaining PCI support.
>
> I'm wondering if QEMU maintainers have a view on "best practice" to
> probe for device props that are common to specific bus types ?

The obvious

    {"execute": "device-list-properties",
     "arguments": {"typename": "pci-device"}}

fails with "Parameter 'typename' expects a non-abstract device type".
But its cousin qom-list-properties works:

    {"execute": "qom-list-properties",
     "arguments": {"typename": "pci-device"}}
    {"return": [
     {"name": "type", "type": "string"},
     {"name": "parent_bus", "type": "link<bus>"},
     {"name": "realized", "type": "bool"},
     {"name": "hotplugged", "type": "bool"},
     {"name": "hotpluggable", "type": "bool"},
     {"name": "failover_pair_id", "type": "str"},
     {"name": "romfile", "type": "str"},
     {"name": "addr", "description": "Slot and optional function number, example: 06.0 or 06", "type": "int32"},
     {"name": "romsize", "type": "uint32"},
     {"name": "x-pcie-lnksta-dllla", "description": "on/off", "type": "bool"},
     {"name": "rombar", "type": "uint32"},
     {"name": "x-pcie-extcap-init", "description": "on/off", "type": "bool"},
     {"name": "acpi-index", "type": "uint32"},
     {"name": "multifunction", "description": "on/off", "type": "bool"},
     {"name": "legacy-addr", "type": "str"}]}

Does this help?



  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-07 13:44 QMP introspecting device props common to a bus type Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-08 11:56 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2021-04-08 12:46   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-08 14:59     ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-09  6:46       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-04-09  9:18         ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-09  9:41           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-09 14:04             ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pmz5at1v.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.