Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc

[Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>]

Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
> with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
> the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
> in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
> version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [Decide extended mask at run time based on platform]
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Will need an ack from perf tools folks, who are not on Cc by the looks.

> diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index f599064..485b1d5 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
>  	PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
>  	PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
>  	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
> -	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
> +	/* Extended registers */
> +	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
> +	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
> +	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
> +	/* Max regs without the extended regs */
> +	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,

I don't really understand this idea of a max that's not the max.

>  };
> +
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK	((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
> +
> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300   (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) \
> +				- PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
> +
>  #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> index e18a355..46ed00d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,10 @@
>  	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DAR] = "dar",
>  	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR] = "dsisr",
>  	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER] = "sier",
> -	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra"
> +	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra",
> +	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
> +	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
> +	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
>  };
>  
>  static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> index 0a52429..9179230 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -6,9 +6,14 @@
>  
>  #include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
>  #include "../../../util/debug.h"
> +#include "../../../util/event.h"
> +#include "../../../util/header.h"
> +#include "../../../perf-sys.h"
>  
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  
> +#define PVR_POWER9		0x004E
> +
>  const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
>  	SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
>  	SMPL_REG(r1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1),
> @@ -55,6 +60,9 @@
>  	SMPL_REG(dsisr, PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR),
>  	SMPL_REG(sier, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER),
>  	SMPL_REG(mmcra, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA),
> +	SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
> +	SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
> +	SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
>  	SMPL_REG_END
>  };
>  
> @@ -163,3 +171,50 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
>  
>  	return SDT_ARG_VALID;
>  }
> +
> +uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
> +{
> +	struct perf_event_attr attr = {
> +		.type                   = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
> +		.config                 = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
> +		.sample_type            = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR,
> +		.precise_ip             = 1,
> +		.disabled               = 1,
> +		.exclude_kernel         = 1,
> +	};
> +	int fd, ret;
> +	char buffer[64];
> +	u32 version;
> +	u64 extended_mask = 0;
> +
> +	/* Get the PVR value to set the extended
> +	 * mask specific to platform

Comment format is wrong, and punctuation please.

> +	 */
> +	get_cpuid(buffer, sizeof(buffer));
> +	ret = sscanf(buffer, "%u,", &version);

This is powerpc specific code, why not just use mfspr(SPRN_PVR), rather
than redirecting via printf/sscanf.

> +
> +	if (ret != 1) {
> +		pr_debug("Failed to get the processor version, unable to output extended registers\n");
> +		return PERF_REGS_MASK;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (version == PVR_POWER9)
> +		extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
> +	else
> +		return PERF_REGS_MASK;
> +
> +	attr.sample_regs_intr = extended_mask;
> +	attr.sample_period = 1;
> +	event_attr_init(&attr);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
> +	 * returning the register mask to sample.
> +	 */
> +	fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
> +	if (fd != -1) {
> +		close(fd);
> +		return (extended_mask | PERF_REGS_MASK);
> +	}
> +	return PERF_REGS_MASK;

I think this would read a bit better like:

	mask = PERF_REGS_MASK;

	if (version == PVR_POWER9)
		extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
        else
        	return mask;

        attr.sample_regs_intr = extended_mask;
        attr.sample_period = 1;
        event_attr_init(&attr);

        /*
          * check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
          * returning the register mask to sample.
          */
        fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
        if (fd != -1) {
                close(fd);
                mask |= extended_mask;
        }

	return mask;


cheers