All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: io_uring vs CPU hotplug, was Re: [PATCH 5/9] blk-mq: don't set data->ctx and data->hctx in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 20:39:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pnaxt9nv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200521092340.GA751297@T590>

Ming,

Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:13:59AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> writes:
>> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:14:18AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > - otherwise, the kthread just retries and retries to allocate & release,
>> > and sooner or later, its time slice is consumed, and migrated out, and the
>> > cpu hotplug handler will get chance to run and move on, then the cpu is
>> > shutdown.
>> 
>> 1) This is based on the assumption that the kthread is in the SCHED_OTHER
>>    scheduling class. Is that really a valid assumption?
>
> Given it is unlikely path, we can add msleep() before retrying when INACTIVE bit
> is observed by current thread, and this way can avoid spinning and should work
> for other schedulers.

That should work, but pretty is something else

>> 
>> 2) What happens in the following scenario:
>> 
>>    unplug
>> 
>>      mq_offline
>>        set_ctx_inactive()
>>        drain_io()
>>        
>>    io_kthread()
>>        try_queue()
>>        wait_on_ctx()
>> 
>>    Can this happen and if so what will wake up that thread?
>
> drain_io() releases all tag of this hctx, then wait_on_ctx() will be waken up
> after any tag is released.

drain_io() is already done ...

So looking at that thread function:

static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
{
	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = data;

        while (...) {
              ....
	      to_submit = io_sqring_entries(ctx);

--> preemption

hotplug runs
   mq_offline()
      set_ctx_inactive();
      drain_io();
      finished();

--> thread runs again

      mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
      ret = io_submit_sqes(ctx, to_submit, NULL, -1, true);
      mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);

      ....

      if (!to_submit || ret == -EBUSY)
          ...
      	  wait_on_ctx();

Can this happen or did drain_io() already take care of the 'to_submit'
items and the call to io_submit_sqes() turns into a zero action ?

If the above happens then nothing will wake it up because the context
draining is done and finished.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-21 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-18  6:39 blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug (simplified version) v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  6:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] blk-mq: split out a __blk_mq_get_driver_tag helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  6:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] blk-mq: remove the bio argument to ->prepare_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  6:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] blk-mq: simplify the blk_mq_get_request calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  6:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] blk-mq: merge blk_mq_rq_ctx_init into __blk_mq_alloc_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  6:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] blk-mq: don't set data->ctx and data->hctx in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  8:32   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18  9:31     ` Ming Lei
2020-05-18 10:42       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 11:54         ` Ming Lei
2020-05-18 13:16           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 14:11             ` Ming Lei
2020-05-18 16:56               ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 18:38                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 18:45                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 18:59                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-19  1:54                 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-19 15:30                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20  1:18                     ` Ming Lei
2020-05-20  3:04                       ` Ming Lei
2020-05-20  8:03                         ` io_uring vs CPU hotplug, was " Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 14:45                           ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-20 15:20                             ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-20 15:31                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-20 19:41                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-20 20:18                                 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-20 22:14                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-20 22:40                                     ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-21  2:27                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-05-21  8:13                                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-21  9:23                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-05-21 18:39                                           ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-05-21 18:45                                             ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-21 20:00                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-22  1:57                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-05-18 18:47             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 13:18           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18  6:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] blk-mq: don't set data->ctx and data->hctx in __blk_mq_alloc_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  6:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] blk-mq: disable preemption during allocating request tag Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  6:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] blk-mq: add blk_mq_all_tag_iter Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  6:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] blk-mq: drain I/O when all CPUs in a hctx are offline Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  8:42   ` John Garry
2020-05-18  9:21     ` Ming Lei
2020-05-18 11:49 ` blk-mq: improvement CPU hotplug (simplified version) v2 John Garry
2020-05-19 15:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-19 17:17     ` John Garry
2020-05-20 14:35     ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pnaxt9nv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.