From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: hung grow Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 12:23:00 +1100 Message-ID: <87po9xyv0r.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> References: <3173c10a-fbd9-f563-4c90-a9f63e020773@youngman.org.uk> <7e23d39b-aebb-0852-c98f-758bd99d3eb9@turmel.org> <89992d1f-172f-9fc6-3a1e-50df34e11d3b@turmel.org> < 74fde85a-2bf0-a627-239d-b12721f0cc32@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Curt , Phil Turmel Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Sun, Oct 08 2017, Curt wrote: > On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Phil Turmel wrote: >> On 10/07/2017 04:45 PM, Curt wrote: >> >> Hmm. Please run the assemble again, with the --verbose option, and >> paste all the output here so we can see what's happening. >> >> Also grab the corresponding tail of dmesg (however many lines cover the >> assembly attempt). >> >> Phil > > You wouldn't think reply all would be such a hard thing to remember to do. > > verbose didn't really add anything, here's my full command, maybe I > miss typed something and didn't notice. > > # mdadm --assemble --force --update=revert-reshape --verbose > /dev/md127 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sdg1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdz1 > mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md127 > mdadm: superblock on /dev/sdf1 doesn't match others - assembly aborted You get this because sdf1 says: Raid Devices : 7 Total Devices : 7 while sda1 (for example) says: Raid Devices : 8 Total Devices : 6 Preferred Minor : 127 Reshape pos'n : 3799296 (3.62 GiB 3.89 GB) Delta Devices : 1 (7->8) mdadm cannot reconcile this difference. It appears that sdf1 was never involved in any reshape. So you need to revert the reshape before trying to include sdf1 into the array. Clearly you need at least 6 devices that were involved in the reshape to do this. I haven't been following closely ... do you have 6 such devices? NeilBrown > > I've got nothing in dmesg or messages > > If I can't get the old drive to work. Is there any chance to still > getting some data from the other drives? Either running the above > without sdf or worse comes to worse the assume clean someone mentioned > before. > > Cheers, > Curt > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEG8Yp69OQ2HB7X0l6Oeye3VZigbkFAlnaz3UACgkQOeye3VZi gbn6nxAAgNURUDAUDtwNT21g2rl4cilLFebRJPRjXnzQNZB2x9UzIcoNM8sypTcY AM5bzlzmebS0L4d7zemE22M+ts1rfhXJ0Ajl6u4fHSayYPRW8aQmHEUTL7t+vfhv 8sZbTBsg3oU0JtnUI+I7CLSJww8rbbkqiQSpZbwSqt4W9AVZqoDwq7tsEz1Yneok pTe0qggdy4FVs913ndGiJjV/s1kvq0OBSDRC/Y+gGE8+xF5NFY+rdQXakdGcyxjT B9ce5fcKrsTrUfIUXk8eLMN7WRaQmV4FfieeAcTYM2GiOG+Ov06/lGfwdc9G7UFc eMG0jwiH/LWOvQdtWVODi5W1De1tCzfhcRuz7mxZxQSXixkBRWETvWRu/APXxLmW TaVfpZyW96F7nUeEaHUbwh6ygVKqtOZxUu1VvqsdKVve7GbEgk5W1h64G+SfSAOS JwBybZO+JS+5+konqcmf4jZXXnERRpOOh07ee7OSITHCUyOuPjrGjsM3OEzgv5QJ TG3a4SjPKVGDWRdBeTwhFKZgfvU2jZlsQeOZUHBp6UCAvHkAaYY4goUcjJBpH4Ei hK205dT2U7UBF5JS/SUtOWBc45hwKs2Fo8R3nUEZAQnVRFixGbjfizVyKAaBYpE/ F1iIYnRMnkCRfvgJDLGbyVsgqnCQzUWl9A0X6Suk94gNgaSy4jI= =Xf4c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--