From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:45:22 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] support/misc/Vagrantfile: bump to ubuntu 16.04 In-Reply-To: (Angelo Compagnucci's message of "Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:04:19 +0200") References: <1476741182-23366-1-git-send-email-angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com> <87r378bnk8.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <87pomolsv1.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Angelo" == Angelo Compagnucci writes: Hi, >> > Vagrant.configure('2') do |config| >> > - config.vm.box = 'ubuntu/trusty64' >> > + config.vm.box = 'bento/ubuntu-16.04' >> >> What is the reason to use a base image from the bento project instead of >> the official ubuntu image? >> >> https://atlas.hashicorp.com/ubuntu/boxes/xenial64 > The official images from Canonical are broken in many ways, for example > this bug [1] prevents the image working properly cause it lacks the vagrant > user. > Bento images are instead very well tested and triaged from the Chef team, > you can find more info here [2] > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1569237 > [2] http://chef.github.io/bento/ Ok, thanks - That would have been useful information in the commit message. -- Venlig hilsen, Peter Korsgaard