From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751113AbbKJF33 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:29:29 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:48528 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761AbbKJF32 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:29:28 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,269,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="597335513" From: "Huang\, Ying" To: Wanpeng Li Cc: 0day robot , , LKML Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [KVM] 0c32e5dd82: stderr: KVM: entry failed, hardware error 0x80000021 References: <87k2pqd3rz.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:29:27 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Wanpeng Li's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:22:04 +0800") Message-ID: <87pozibex4.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Wanpeng Li writes: > On 11/10/15 9:47 AM, kernel test robot wrote: >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on >> >> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Wanpeng-Li/KVM-x86-Reset-RFLAGS-state-following-processor-init-reset/20151103-194355 >> commit 0c32e5dd82fd0e63fd9e6aecf5a4bffbdf2ab207 ("KVM: x86: Reset RFLAGS state following processor init/reset") >> >> The stderr of kvm-unit-tests is as follow for your commit. > > Thanks for the report, however, I don't think maintainer pick this > patch in any tree currently, which tree you are testing against? We test patches from LKML directly now :) Best Regards, Huang, Ying From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3464775892650871286==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Huang, Ying To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [KVM] 0c32e5dd82: stderr: KVM: entry failed, hardware error 0x80000021 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:29:27 +0800 Message-ID: <87pozibex4.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: --===============3464775892650871286== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wanpeng Li writes: > On 11/10/15 9:47 AM, kernel test robot wrote: >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on >> >> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Wanpeng-Li/KVM-x86-Reset-RFLAGS-state-f= ollowing-processor-init-reset/20151103-194355 >> commit 0c32e5dd82fd0e63fd9e6aecf5a4bffbdf2ab207 ("KVM: x86: Reset RFLAGS= state following processor init/reset") >> >> The stderr of kvm-unit-tests is as follow for your commit. > > Thanks for the report, however, I don't think maintainer pick this > patch in any tree currently, which tree you are testing against? We test patches from LKML directly now :) Best Regards, Huang, Ying --===============3464775892650871286==--