From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C571EC33CB1 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DE0F206D5 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="BnGElqag" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8DE0F206D5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1is541-0001rG-MG for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:19:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1is52u-0000Sv-LY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:18:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1is52p-0004Qd-48 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:18:46 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:56339 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1is52o-0004Q8-Rx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:18:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579180721; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0Njat9O9Yvf9BO3EutegTNopEQwKWREg6tK8Trl1cPQ=; b=BnGElqagbIc7Yng2xtSdUjlNqVnRY/fD5dFs1C54yljsjvonh/ipl2VBbkO97fV0wPXuH4 tS3noIxeMzQ2nGOIxVoC7hAx00RmYL44X1kuEdnMkGPkK/sSuD46Sb2sFJsNlRW53jemWn bGDJwXYvqRShsa9JkWnBiNCa6+3Qo3w= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-121-Dby6_l_uNDiYEXrz89jNFg-1; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:18:38 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7442D8018A7; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-117-192.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.192]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47297811FF; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:18:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/12] migration: Add multiRDMA capability support In-Reply-To: <20200115180907.GH3811@work-vm> (David Alan Gilbert's message of "Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:09:07 +0000") References: <20200109045922.904-1-fengzhimin1@huawei.com> <20200109045922.904-2-fengzhimin1@huawei.com> <20200115180907.GH3811@work-vm> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:18:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87r1zz8rpz.fsf@secure.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-MC-Unique: Dby6_l_uNDiYEXrz89jNFg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Cc: zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com, Zhimin Feng , armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jemmy858585@gmail.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote: > * Zhimin Feng (fengzhimin1@huawei.com) wrote: >> From: fengzhimin >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: fengzhimin > > Instead of creating x-multirdma as a capability and the corresponding > parameter for the number of channels; it would be better just > to use the multifd parameters when used with an rdma transport; > as far as I know multifd doesn't work with rdma at the moment, > and to the user the idea of multifd over rdma is just the same thing. I was about to suggest that. We could setup both capabilities: multifd + rdma