From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kuninori Morimoto Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 8/8] ASoC: add snd-soc-dummy DT support Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <87r403mtip.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> References: <87fvgriqrb.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <874mx7iqgt.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <53F9A6EE.5070005@metafoo.de> <871ts4nmki.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <20140826062558.GR17528@sirena.org.uk> <87wq9vmyyc.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <20140826091120.GC17528@sirena.org.uk> <53FC5105.6070901@metafoo.de> <20140826094211.GF17528@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140826094211.GF17528-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen , Kuninori Morimoto , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux-ALSA , Simon , Liam Girdwood List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, Lars I'm confusing > > >If we're already specifying the DAI links for the (D)PCM code it seems > > >like we shouldn't also have to put DAPM routes for them in DT as well. > > > Yes, and I think we shouldn't use anything except for datahsheet pin names > > in the devicetree routing, because otherwise we are leaking driver > > implementation details. It came from snd_soc_of_parse_audio_routing() Do you mean this function itself is not good ? > While I agree with the sentiment for this when it comes to DAIs we > probably want to use the name the interfaces get in the documentation > rather than pin names since they involve multiple pins working together. Sorry, but what does your "interfaces get in the documentation" mean ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html