From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A6CC47089 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 23:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41EF610CE for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 23:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235184AbhE0X60 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 19:58:26 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:37652 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235458AbhE0X5n (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 19:57:43 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1622159767; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z5UWkx6Wnl65X6YJnmTsZ2D7MvQO0yZczFWAIiQ/a0M=; b=Ext7pp+5dGsbUIMORCWNxug9W3FXaKax+xsFmcKM0MOYNb978Xc05RUO6+h37IfKYjR1Up EAvSANiL7zx7VJJtgplCT77kP7n6ejx1ANuFay3d6IUZYPYzxcSMIlBylVe4jR9ldUzvI0 QmNSE/bEa/07InGUr9qd/vapmnulFb1tmgM1eMNnb5ScrxyuEuRQDUuqF3BSxNMUYQHP3M h3uRF9nwP1GzMq489aBeGB1LaC2AQ5ur1qzKiPwwFO+edUHwHBSuPM9jnh+AMj+pBfmixW Flcg6uftwkrQOB7WftQ8bLHL/eDduu78t180ISfH0EMhxel9fiNnUhm8hbTYhA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1622159767; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z5UWkx6Wnl65X6YJnmTsZ2D7MvQO0yZczFWAIiQ/a0M=; b=Uhs8WBgU+I0HvuuiQ9cSoYSASwQVhvHkVAQJ3IGeOhUSotGcySZ9VBUf3MjBVRtlwFmtT8 aaud0SBul2Lh8MBA== To: Paolo Bonzini , syzbot , bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, jarkko@kernel.org, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, seanjc@google.com, steve.wahl@hpe.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in x86_emulate_instruction In-Reply-To: <0f6e6423-f93a-5d96-f452-4e08dbad9b23@redhat.com> References: <000000000000f3fc9305c2e24311@google.com> <87v9737pt8.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <0f6e6423-f93a-5d96-f452-4e08dbad9b23@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 01:56:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87sg277muh.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 28 2021 at 01:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 28/05/21 00:52, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> So this is stale for a week now. It's fully reproducible and nobody >> can't be bothered to look at that? >> >> What's wrong with you people? > > Actually there's a patch on list ("KVM: X86: Fix warning caused by stale > emulation context"). Take care. That's useful, but does not change the fact that nobody bothered to reply to this report ...