From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B254C433DF for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 088A420734 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=epam.com header.i=@epam.com header.b="CrReyM7f" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 088A420734 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=epam.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jmCu2-0000oo-LO; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:01:38 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jmCu1-0000oj-5t for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:01:37 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 7a7b9692-b20b-11ea-bb8b-bc764e2007e4 Received: from EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (unknown [40.107.4.76]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 7a7b9692-b20b-11ea-bb8b-bc764e2007e4; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:01:36 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jZuLuQvySxAps6jBA17Wfd1Own+D6o4F1PO/0tBpFpmw32CxNZZFGkJ8X55wrCMnx6hPtxP+PTnKSH/RvtiEB3nrBNm7AUH6kFEFPcAMVA2XcywIHe/EihAE5OuidCQ+9T54G1bDc912EF0gHsEH//HB5rjG1hByT6m/WlGpcj0SoB9btzWocLvxO+3a1FmIx7iRzEdWvjXlh0Hf7NZ8lvhgdFFdoBbH8qfH869Ncr3f1mHZPw5BNl1c8NigRwAMJUVWzOAmODW4UCHGmY2A2Ej2qVoS/0VzWxOmrUVOIo8loEtrsmG4ujUglEjv+ZYIp5e6A6cLks4/XgOk33kmew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cowXw8WTi53GmEDVmNewfn2D9Hr6EV/2QnhPcV8Mg2Y=; b=h/G/EQ1tLJjXOqKKAv/O13cBHTkhC0L4Fg/VtqDPyAJmrAGxysx16aqgvJGO7IgnpShNSZSrTlnHSvFMlgbXs5KaNyAsJqDejxDteDZ3oTyj2peAMxIGDEnDiFFBh7zHIQC2e/OtT1tJ/FcyUPVri4ix3BpBIR2zh3QS0RO1SoXqPy3FTalhz1nlr5QSx31lRsIXCkNsGF1EPvrt9beFHbih7dF87v7puitAqLJ1ER83+ptWhjOLEE4X4g3ssXrzGNExXLWBO+tpE6rfnpSnBke2rujFnC+PRLG2MRZiR9XlgN72XmDMrXHK2nSJTlhgQPXZ8lBVMOtZra/c6OxFaw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=epam.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=epam.com; dkim=pass header.d=epam.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=epam.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cowXw8WTi53GmEDVmNewfn2D9Hr6EV/2QnhPcV8Mg2Y=; b=CrReyM7fH6MBgC6yZLoqCufhpxMQAIM5EnMbKuTULmENFDjRhpKTe2Duee9tMQnYc/57CzM0UeA6Hu28LRwLf6DGMWdg21RBl+dZEzh/ZjK9tdXUiAw8AbpwizZFxedwAGiwmKLCrLubVhC8zJMoEL/grnPExA6mB6cbHZD0KG+We3l17M+DP5nXY0NvT3qF15dpAhAw1l/3EABhzy827/xofOP8Q39fTjh35NOJPMgzX/+T2FNhn9rvCZ2d08ijEasLzcFyI/kMwaQobDbLAJjOa5rPF3BiNBlMyoatXsMfbLm2ZU3b8901jdwWm8Z/y9lzaJj8yPFX4dEcPit24A== Received: from VI1PR03MB2926.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:802:35::28) by VI1PR03MB4670.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:803:5d::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3088.18; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:01:33 +0000 Received: from VI1PR03MB2926.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::95fd:55d9:421b:1f37]) by VI1PR03MB2926.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::95fd:55d9:421b:1f37%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.023; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:01:33 +0000 From: Volodymyr Babchuk To: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH] optee: immediately free buffers that are released by OP-TEE Thread-Topic: [PATCH] optee: immediately free buffers that are released by OP-TEE Thread-Index: AQHWI0fTRy+rlPvmsUKZMLlR49t2iaiiqEuAgAAKD4CAANCDAIA7s8+AgACw6QCAAAJPAA== Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:01:33 +0000 Message-ID: <87sger1lar.fsf@epam.com> References: <20200506014246.3397490-1-volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com> <51b8c855-5e94-2829-a703-d43c84948120@xen.org> <57e24ddd-5ba1-eea9-2961-d7dc9ce22688@xen.org> In-Reply-To: <57e24ddd-5ba1-eea9-2961-d7dc9ce22688@xen.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 authentication-results: xen.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;xen.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=epam.com; x-originating-ip: [176.36.48.175] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a3474750-dc00-4a81-d959-08d8142f5d56 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR03MB4670: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-forefront-prvs: 0439571D1D x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 9saxKQfWq7mSjQipbKWSIAJUD8os+JLqZmMxcx5jl06+ziZHF/I1y2bfaul5vIpUONlZVARWat9Ai2rza70QG51dkVl398UmmL+DplYaHJ7wMWkHmhF1TllwdvTGqST5HxHVjdXnvSklpTJZ1HBZ7tzsPL7UFd7gNhMGJjG7esm/H24pI1fZWKlMXqHto+y2/clP8li11RB3m5ZvYOjCWJoNdWA3R7ottZ3TR77TFzO304nu5o/NMEYWYwcmgiXcOGh9BFv66AapxYHZZsraXS1R/3f/ihxR5xjTfedbkrtPIhdmG+SrWVMpgeWP50GjV/CxBTqncydWGuE68BGwIJeGQs7/Z1xQTrgRQqaZ0xJ6WTks5EoLiPbbGzlULs/o x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:VI1PR03MB2926.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(376002)(346002)(6506007)(36756003)(55236004)(4326008)(53546011)(6486002)(316002)(91956017)(2616005)(186003)(66476007)(26005)(66946007)(54906003)(64756008)(66556008)(66446008)(76116006)(83380400001)(6916009)(6512007)(8936002)(71200400001)(478600001)(86362001)(4744005)(8676002)(2906002)(5660300002)(14773001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: xmm2xT8Ds9jS4/JDXZAlOuBgIAxtKntLFkKdTfaiRRreZOkiE9FbvERkyqamHM+pn7fk+S/0BMlnx31KNgY5izq9Y4RvvEPkc3TPM3q3NEmoEasSduUatHCW5MNlD0U0uBFRBfnTiKyof+dDviCVti6flZKwAqqkQYUpV877ucJqIcBlS9CidS0TBUoYekAWLE7N6PIuH5Ys/T0BV1VfDeCwSBRacq23q1IQx1MTeaWAQDr/P5HfiHsPF/BbjgMHe49X0Pe+ZXrmD0/XAdR/vlQujjEu/IoyKbIbb9hQpac7d3WKJUyKg7NOt5SrZUUDxzGZvEFBHP1tV9QY0XLMnEeNkVhtJUIpE+DjXW6+8uYtZ1CW/iDLXnQypSDlde40Z9JjEsjw2+VYbBn2WHM4Qlok31C0lr3iMt1JO2a+zvFm13cxJ1sI7k8oGLePdJvwVJqjBYbl/lgMskmSI7sbHNYUtrPL1nNMDb+b3q8vRao= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: epam.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a3474750-dc00-4a81-d959-08d8142f5d56 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Jun 2020 09:01:33.3657 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: b41b72d0-4e9f-4c26-8a69-f949f367c91d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: FINU/zhGd7n+TIy1EGcwDaVD7rY2izZ7jJwTDyaaL9DDyBP7t6a72c5k8MPsUvnjqHAQrCYxEK76I/Ev4ldAS/Mua2lwsbhMGMA3aNHataU= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR03MB4670 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "tee-dev@lists.linaro.org" , Andrew Cooper , Stefano Stabellini , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Julien, Paul, Julien Grall writes: > On 18/06/2020 23:20, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> Hi Paul, Julien, >> >> Volodymyr hasn't come back with an update to this patch, but I think it >> is good enough as-is as a bug fix and I would rather have it in its >> current form in 4.14 than not having it at all leaving the bug unfixed. >> >> I think Julien agrees. > > The approach is okayish but this is not ideal at least without any > explanation why ignoring a potential bug is fine. I could settle with > an expanded commit message for now. > > Therefore, I don't feel I should provide my Ack on this approach. That > said, I am not the maintainers of this code. You are free to Ack and > commit it. Sorry for the delay. I'll provide v2 later today. --=20 Volodymyr Babchuk at EPAM=