Paul Kocialkowski writes: > Hi, > > Le mercredi 20 mars 2019 à 09:56 -0700, Eric Anholt a écrit : >> Paul Kocialkowski writes: >> >> > The firstopen DRM driver hook was initially used to perform hardware >> > initialization, which is now considered legacy. Only a single user of >> > firstopen remains at this point (savage). >> > >> > In some specific cases, non-legacy drivers may also need to implement >> > these hooks. For instance on VC4, we need to allocate a 16 MiB buffer >> > for the GPU. Because it's not required for fbcon, it's a waste to >> > allocate it before userspace starts using the DRM device. >> > >> > Using firstopen and lastclose for this allocation seems like the best >> > fit, so re-habilitate the hook to allow it to be called for non-legacy >> > drivers. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski >> > --- >> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 3 +-- >> > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 2 +- >> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c >> > index b1838a41ad43..c011b5cbfb6b 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c >> > @@ -266,8 +266,7 @@ static int drm_setup(struct drm_device * dev) >> > { >> > int ret; >> > >> > - if (dev->driver->firstopen && >> > - drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY)) { >> > + if (dev->driver->firstopen) { >> > ret = dev->driver->firstopen(dev); >> > if (ret != 0) >> > return ret; >> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h >> > index ca46a45a9cce..aa14607e54d4 100644 >> > --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h >> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h >> > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ struct drm_driver { >> > * to set/unset the VT into raw mode. >> > * >> > * Legacy drivers initialize the hardware in the @firstopen callback, >> > - * which isn't even called for modern drivers. >> > + * modern drivers can use it for other purposes only. >> > */ >> > void (*lastclose) (struct drm_device *); >> >> Our usage in vc4 is not very different from what we called "hardware >> initialization" in other devices. I would rather just delete this >> sentence entirely. > > Sounds good to me! With the delete, the series is: Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt but hopefully someone other than a vc4 developer (danvet?) can make the call on whether undeprecating firstopen/lastclose for this is reasonable.