From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752341AbdJKN1M (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:27:12 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:15275 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752045AbdJKN1K (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:27:10 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,361,1503385200"; d="scan'208";a="161939079" From: Felipe Balbi To: Alexandre Torgue , Amelie Delaunay , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Maxime Coquelin , John Youn Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Benjamin Gaignard Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] Add support for USB OTG on STM32F7 In-Reply-To: <1c4180ef-2da6-b420-7c6e-41769608384a@st.com> References: <1503930018-536-1-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <878tgim24i.fsf@linux.intel.com> <04a49088-b615-d7b8-0387-e7bfa32ee19f@st.com> <87vajllx8t.fsf@linux.intel.com> <1c4180ef-2da6-b420-7c6e-41769608384a@st.com> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:26:53 +0300 Message-ID: <87sheplsrm.fsf@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Alexandre Torgue writes: > Hi > > On 10/11/2017 01:50 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Alexandre Torgue writes: >>> Hi Felip >>> >>> On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Amelie Delaunay writes: >>>>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB >>>>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its >>>>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI phy >>>>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy. >>>>> >>>>> Amelie Delaunay (7): >>>>> dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding >>>>> usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS >>>>> ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU >>>> >>>> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems >>>> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers. >>>> >>> >>> I will take other DT patches in my PR. >>> >>> Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch >>> I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32 >>> pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to >>> define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT >>> patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue. >>> It is possible that I take also this one ? >> >> In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack: >> >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi >> >> I'll drop them from my tree now > > Ok perfect, I will take DT patches (3 to 7) and I let you take patch 1&2 > in your tree. Well, I have dropped them from my tree. Please two 1-7 through yours. -- balbi From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] Add support for USB OTG on STM32F7 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:26:53 +0300 Message-ID: <87sheplsrm.fsf@linux.intel.com> References: <1503930018-536-1-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <878tgim24i.fsf@linux.intel.com> <04a49088-b615-d7b8-0387-e7bfa32ee19f@st.com> <87vajllx8t.fsf@linux.intel.com> <1c4180ef-2da6-b420-7c6e-41769608384a@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1c4180ef-2da6-b420-7c6e-41769608384a-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Alexandre Torgue , Amelie Delaunay , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Maxime Coquelin , John Youn Cc: linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Benjamin Gaignard List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, Alexandre Torgue writes: > Hi > > On 10/11/2017 01:50 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Alexandre Torgue writes: >>> Hi Felip >>> >>> On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Amelie Delaunay writes: >>>>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB >>>>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its >>>>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI phy >>>>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy. >>>>> >>>>> Amelie Delaunay (7): >>>>> dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding >>>>> usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS >>>>> ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU >>>> >>>> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems >>>> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers. >>>> >>> >>> I will take other DT patches in my PR. >>> >>> Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch >>> I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32 >>> pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to >>> define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT >>> patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue. >>> It is possible that I take also this one ? >> >> In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack: >> >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi >> >> I'll drop them from my tree now > > Ok perfect, I will take DT patches (3 to 7) and I let you take patch 1&2 > in your tree. Well, I have dropped them from my tree. Please two 1-7 through yours. -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:26:53 +0300 Subject: [PATCHv2 0/7] Add support for USB OTG on STM32F7 In-Reply-To: <1c4180ef-2da6-b420-7c6e-41769608384a@st.com> References: <1503930018-536-1-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <878tgim24i.fsf@linux.intel.com> <04a49088-b615-d7b8-0387-e7bfa32ee19f@st.com> <87vajllx8t.fsf@linux.intel.com> <1c4180ef-2da6-b420-7c6e-41769608384a@st.com> Message-ID: <87sheplsrm.fsf@linux.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, Alexandre Torgue writes: > Hi > > On 10/11/2017 01:50 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Alexandre Torgue writes: >>> Hi Felip >>> >>> On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Amelie Delaunay writes: >>>>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB >>>>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its >>>>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI phy >>>>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy. >>>>> >>>>> Amelie Delaunay (7): >>>>> dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding >>>>> usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS >>>>> ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU >>>> >>>> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems >>>> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers. >>>> >>> >>> I will take other DT patches in my PR. >>> >>> Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch >>> I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32 >>> pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to >>> define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT >>> patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue. >>> It is possible that I take also this one ? >> >> In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack: >> >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi >> >> I'll drop them from my tree now > > Ok perfect, I will take DT patches (3 to 7) and I let you take patch 1&2 > in your tree. Well, I have dropped them from my tree. Please two 1-7 through yours. -- balbi