From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:33552 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752857AbcKTS7y (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Nov 2016 13:59:54 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id u144so21106671wmu.0 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:59:53 -0800 (PST) From: Nicolai Stange To: Greg KH Cc: Nicolai Stange , Mike Marshall , Al Viro , linux-fsdevel , Linus Torvalds , Martin Brandenburg Subject: Re: debugfs question... References: <20161031193823.GA11187@kroah.com> <87wpgoff0o.fsf@gmail.com> <877f876wo9.fsf@gmail.com> <20161114065519.GA29810@kroah.com> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:59:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20161114065519.GA29810@kroah.com> (Greg KH's message of "Mon, 14 Nov 2016 07:55:19 +0100") Message-ID: <87shqmkme0.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Greg KH writes: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 07:51:02PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote: >> This is what I got wrong: debugfs does acquire the needed references >> correctly (details below). For the case of f2fs' "status" file, the >> file_operations ->owner is simply not set as it should have been, >> i.e. to THIS_MODULE. > > Ah, good, care to make a f2fs patch to resolve the issue there? For completeness here: just sent out. Thanks, Nicolai