From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0BwK-0000iY-6n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:50:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0BwB-0007gf-3d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:50:20 -0400 Received: from oxygen.pond.sub.org ([2a01:4f8:201:233:1::3]:33467) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0BwA-0007gY-UG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:50:11 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1403073840-32603-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:50:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1403073840-32603-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:43:24 +0200") Message-ID: <87simrbrgv.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2.1 00/36] Pending monitor patches for 2.1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: lcapitulino@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, wenchaoqemu@gmail.com Paolo Bonzini writes: > This includes: > > - Max's dependency fixes for QAPI scripts > > - Wenchao's QAPI event series > > - my thread-safety fixes, rebased onto QAPI events The QAPI event series messed up two out of three event types tested in qemu-iotests, if I count them correctly. How can we gain confidence that we're not breaking half of the events not tested there, too?