From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630CEC433F5 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 14:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2909660F6E for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 14:59:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 2909660F6E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56614 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mkSbF-0001Hi-9d for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:59:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mkSaW-0000Wl-LK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:59:04 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:28514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mkSaS-0006u4-U8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:59:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1636469940; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Cs2675x2rR8un3NVj2DsQTzmay+tzFtkbUJG2hNU+x0=; b=UodpVk8gCQrz6Swuden58CpNhR2m3byaSF3SOpoyeQ+wNA7WYLFQSwDwupgnLlCnO9Ml2n 3UgVht2oPDAmUc0Evc2w+ZZ+NDFVmWpiYW2/CKxR6QPVbg3l9GDcK6u1krDbR6E5cZaDzG xZwMysTKmLWjS22/BIti9c205iRWgSc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-227-_8_BLXDAPAaWfJFPWQAWuA-1; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:58:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: _8_BLXDAPAaWfJFPWQAWuA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92E5D1B2C9A3; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 14:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-112-7.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.7]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D31F19C59; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 14:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E8E211380A7; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:58:53 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/19] docs/devel: document expectations for QAPI data modelling for QMP References: <20210930132349.3601823-1-berrange@redhat.com> <20210930132349.3601823-4-berrange@redhat.com> <871r45p6er.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <87ilx8h3wk.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <87bl2tg7dq.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 15:58:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: ("Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:47:12 +0000") Message-ID: <87tuglbck2.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=armbru@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.699, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Laurent Vivier , Thomas Huth , Eduardo Habkost , David Hildenbrand , Michael Roth , Cornelia Huck , Richard Henderson , Yuval Shaia , Peter Xu , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic , Christian Borntraeger , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann , Paolo Bonzini , Eric Blake , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 writes: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 07:39:29AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 writes: >>=20 >> > On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 06:43:23AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 writes: >> >>=20 >> >> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 04:24:31PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 w= rote: >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 04:31:40PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> >> > This clashes with my "[PATCH v2 0/9] Configurable policy for han= dling >> >> >> > unstable interfaces", which replaces "you must give unstable stu= ff names >> >> >> > starting with 'x-'" by "you must give unstable stuff feature fla= g >> >> >> > 'unstable' (and may give it a name starting with 'x-')". >> >> >>=20 >> >> >> If your series goes in first, I'll update this to take account of = it, >> >> >> but for now I'll leave it as is. >> >> > >> >> > This patch has now merged to git master. >> >>=20 >> >> Merge commit e86e00a2493, Nov 3. >> >>=20 >> >> > If you re-post your series feel free to update the new docs, or let >> >> > me know if you want me to do it afterwards. >> >>=20 >> >> The latter, because my series went in before yours, in merge commit >> >> dd61b91c080, Oct 29 :) >> > >> > Sigh, I'm blind ! Dunno how i missed that. >>=20 >> I can do it for you (it's such a simple patch), but I'd rather not do it >> in addition to you :) > > I've not started yet, so I'll let you do it since you probably have a > better idea of the preferred language to describe it. I'll promise my > review services in return. [PATCH] qapi: Belatedly mark unstable QMP parts with feature 'unstable'