From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F45C433E1 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4B020838 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="PsebHZL9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5E4B020838 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:45382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kABV0-0005I1-Fw for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:22:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34382) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kABUM-0004lp-It for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:22:15 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:32096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kABUK-0000oT-3s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:22:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1598271730; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pcbRWMMKcjIs1Jv/XBSeaV/DmhisrRwyReviTzI4lKs=; b=PsebHZL92jlTzFq8VsVvMpQ81psPN1X/q8BuOPwO6un4THcya5Nw/VEvd1+6Ibqsce2wO4 abIIInt8jowDbcSlWl/KitaJS0LuWlkJcYXfLw/MZVsvtrg5RzAqBwpQbjAlCa8guouThP 4LpjZaOAFl0Gbxeguc2fvmMpE2vUWnU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-236-adioZiDBO6WtavFu7hHC6Q-1; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:22:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: adioZiDBO6WtavFu7hHC6Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F3CB801AC9; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-112-74.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.74]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53209197E5; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 85E7E1138648; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:22:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: zhaolichang Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] fix some comment spelling errors References: <20200812101500.2066-1-zhaolichang@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:22:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200812101500.2066-1-zhaolichang@huawei.com> (zhaolichang@huawei.com's message of "Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:14:50 +0800") Message-ID: <87tuwsqln6.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=armbru@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/24 06:48:00 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.956, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" zhaolichang writes: > I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu, > so I used the spellcheck tool to check the spelling errors, this series fixed this > spelling errors. What's the reason for "RFC"?