From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: add
	snd_soc_card_disconnect_sync()
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:47:10 +0000
Message-ID: <87tvz6nknl.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
References: <87fuaqp5e7.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
 <87bmlep58s.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
 <20171011084252.awkhvhpuubj4gdvy@sirena.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from relmlie1.idc.renesas.com (relmlor2.renesas.com
 [210.160.252.172])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7932B26735C
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:47:16 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20171011084252.awkhvhpuubj4gdvy@sirena.co.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, Simon <horms@verge.net.au>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org


Hi Mark

> > +void snd_soc_card_disconnect_sync(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_lookup_component(dev, NULL);
> > +
> > +	if (!component || !component->card)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	snd_card_disconnect_sync(component->card->snd_card);
> 
> Is this the right name for ASoC or should it just be
> snd_soc_disconnect_sync()?  It'll work for any device that's in a card.

Ahh, indeed.
snd_soc_disconnect_sync() is better naming.
I will fix name in v2 (Based on Takashi's branch)

Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto