From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755082AbcAYCPb (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:15:31 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:53327 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754662AbcAYCPa (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:15:30 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,342,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="897511385" From: "Huang\, Ying" To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: "Huang\, Ying" , Sudip Mukherjee , Mark Brown , , LKML Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [spi] 2baed30cb3: BUG: scheduling while atomic: systemd-udevd/134/0x00000002 References: <87bn8h5bbe.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> <20160120044247.GA3238@sudip-pc> <87a8o0yhdz.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> <20160121053310.GA4782@sudip-pc> <87oacfqyap.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> <20160121060652.GA5697@sudip-pc> <20160123063947.GA26921@sudip-pc> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:15:27 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20160123063947.GA26921@sudip-pc> (Sudip Mukherjee's message of "Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:09:47 +0530") Message-ID: <87twm2be0w.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sudip Mukherjee writes: > Hi Huang, Ying, > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:36:52AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:47:10PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> > Sudip Mukherjee writes: >> > >> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:00:40PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> > >> Sudip Mukherjee writes: >> > >> >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:44:37AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> >> > > >> > > I am not able to reproduce this. Tested just with the kernel and >> > > yocto-minimal-i386.cgz filesystem and it booted properly. >> > > >> > > I guess I need atleast your job file to reproduce this. >> > >> > This is a boot test so I did not attached the job file. But the test >> > result may depends on specific root file system. For example, the >> > process when BUG report is always systemd-udevd. Maybe you need a >> > systemd based root file system. >> >> So silly of me. Since you said 2baed30cb3, so i kept looking at that >> patch. >> Can you please test again after reverting: >> ebd43516d387 ("Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay") >> >> If it solves the problem then I will submit a formal patch. > > Did you get a chance to test it? Sorry for late, as the new report just sent. Reverting the specified commit can solve the issue. Best Regards, Huang, Ying From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8083215098411008632==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Huang, Ying To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [spi] 2baed30cb3: BUG: scheduling while atomic: systemd-udevd/134/0x00000002 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:15:27 +0800 Message-ID: <87twm2be0w.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20160123063947.GA26921@sudip-pc> List-Id: --===============8083215098411008632== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sudip Mukherjee writes: > Hi Huang, Ying, > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:36:52AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:47:10PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> > Sudip Mukherjee writes: >> > = >> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:00:40PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> > >> Sudip Mukherjee writes: >> > >> = >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:44:37AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> >> > > >> > > I am not able to reproduce this. Tested just with the kernel and >> > > yocto-minimal-i386.cgz filesystem and it booted properly. >> > > >> > > I guess I need atleast your job file to reproduce this. >> > = >> > This is a boot test so I did not attached the job file. But the test >> > result may depends on specific root file system. For example, the >> > process when BUG report is always systemd-udevd. Maybe you need a >> > systemd based root file system. >> = >> So silly of me. Since you said 2baed30cb3, so i kept looking at that >> patch. >> Can you please test again after reverting: >> ebd43516d387 ("Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay") >> = >> If it solves the problem then I will submit a formal patch. > > Did you get a chance to test it? Sorry for late, as the new report just sent. Reverting the specified commit can solve the issue. Best Regards, Huang, Ying --===============8083215098411008632==--