From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mslow1.mail.gandi.net (mslow1.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992EF8AA7 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::225]) by mslow1.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2B6CE01A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: philippe.gerum@sourcetrek.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 264B61C0005; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:39:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenomai.org; s=gm1; t=1668537581; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2pTQU5jWYQXhjCMEnURQ42ey88+JhO0Os9y//Dsh72E=; b=maqxzeVnNPCk01V8yna6M8JX4M8CI+jiUE6ZAl9JlLCgcSaZ9hfwOGflz9Jo+hB4v8dWfX Ktq74OGfPbU63ILIyoE6P6buHy6POw5XX180QPP2GsJKHezxC8cTLmbiovjSrN3m07Qkqx xE70+FST87yZ0iEaKmjMR78dI17wKNxMJI2cW8ISQKGdpaYYTkfH5OAtbRPWCBEScwyx5g IC8WnQ8iM9hOd9/nrtuuwB2tS9YXwW7EAZZIrm2ubhzjTsnwcl8oi7gKtnEIafteWfXf67 FqwxnxsCn4AvVNfOh5eMgdfop+mr9k3h18sRI3gQNcwDoaAxAbaXoKSDE2px+Q== References: <877d04dm52.fsf@xenomai.org> <87leodn9kv.fsf@xenomai.org> <87zgcs4ma1.fsf@xenomai.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.6; emacs 28.1 From: Philippe Gerum To: Russell Johnson Cc: "xenomai@lists.linux.dev" , Bryan Butler , Shawn McManus Subject: Re: [External] - Re: EVL Memory Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:36:31 +0100 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87v8ng3vv7.fsf@xenomai.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: xenomai@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Russell Johnson writes: > [[S/MIME Signed Part:Undecided]] > Sometimes I saw this issue in seconds/minutes. However, I did just see it > run over night on one system, and it hasn't died yet. I did see one kernel > splat from that run though, so I attached it here. Ok, this splat is a false positive from an assertion which should have been removed now that the PI walk is preemptible. The case it complains about is valid, I'll push a fix to address this tomorrow. > I am building the kernel > with the parameters you recommended to turn off as we speak. I will share > with you what I see once I get it installed and running. > Thanks, -- Philippe.