Hi,

(please break your emails at 80-columns)

Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com> writes:
>>> One more thing. Workaround has implemented algorithm that decide for which
>>> endpoint it should be enabled.  e.g for composite device MSC+NCM+ACM it
>>> should work only for ACM OUT endpoint.
>>>
>>
>>If ACM driver didn't queue the request for ACM OUT endpoint, why does the
>>controller accept the data at all?
>>
>>I didn't understand why we need a workaround for this. It should be standard
>>behaviour to NAK data if function driver didn't request for all endpoints.
>
> Yes, I agree with you. Controller shouldn’t accept such packet. As I know this
> behavior will be fixed in RTL.
>
> But I assume that some older version of this controller are one the market,
> and driver should work correct with them.
>
> In the feature this workaround can be limited only to selected controllers.
>
> Even now I assume that it can be enabled/disabled by module parameter.

no module parameters, please. Use revision detection in runtime.

-- 
balbi