From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757312AbdJKLvK (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:51:10 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:55126 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752069AbdJKLuc (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:50:32 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,361,1503385200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="321978083" From: Felipe Balbi To: Alexandre Torgue , Amelie Delaunay , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Maxime Coquelin , John Youn Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Benjamin Gaignard Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] Add support for USB OTG on STM32F7 In-Reply-To: <04a49088-b615-d7b8-0387-e7bfa32ee19f@st.com> References: <1503930018-536-1-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <878tgim24i.fsf@linux.intel.com> <04a49088-b615-d7b8-0387-e7bfa32ee19f@st.com> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:50:10 +0300 Message-ID: <87vajllx8t.fsf@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Alexandre Torgue writes: > Hi Felip > > On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> Amelie Delaunay writes: >>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB >>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its >>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI p= hy >>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy. >>> >>> Amelie Delaunay (7): >>> dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding >>> usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS >>> ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU >>=20 >> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems >> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers. >>=20 > > I will take other DT patches in my PR. > > Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch= =20 > I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32=20 > pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to=20 > define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT=20 > patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue. > It is possible that I take also this one ? In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack: Acked-by: Felipe Balbi I'll drop them from my tree now =2D-=20 balbi --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEElLzh7wn96CXwjh2IzL64meEamQYFAlneBXIACgkQzL64meEa mQZmqhAA1qFxb9/dvSAfQ5oXcSSAq5wpeVNcTvkGmG68m4+BnbIMq/J2oPdx4MdX AIiVL6DxeyPJP7ldfdlbz6RmwoVdhi9fYhLiMxWH/n4gtsXKLo8O+OeXcQvj167h qJkY5ilDakMln5hdsZJywpNaAWlzPb8EV+jZ8ELUHXPVyKpMbvndZwPkNoiHl/79 E+W1pYa0klJbI9JcysPXeTd25SLrKDY5AirxxfxKJfJEAbuVl+2okIZu7vE23KIs uPubwkVk1bPVdof1P88LLfkU+hzBkDo3ZVokx0EiNQtnjrAlyDUFd2bYxpbqxCR9 /VVabCHQi72iC5XOlYAw6XJ7S6qQ21ROlIA5IWdoHyStNYeSGQaqHqRylMTZE9/a HsyLtqKeQuCiBxMag82nMLVpC/25j7HqORg6o3+ckqcfQ+HwrR5WPaSTXDtNtmxy MFZRMK3fc/YMq0TJRqeAqo71F7xYgVQqB2PjkVT+LRQezflUFimjrf12MCv8FZ89 8QouguQlHat7/1u1LjWWGNglXwLO5x932lhgFK8FFbWDLrAPhzZ+TRheYErDqfWQ 9GSsNgJDqH6GcC+kxocQF6TKmX9hmRbkarqFFaQs4LL7QHWQsRXcTaAF2qaG/l2z X4BK1BEJwLZe+QW598rWdVvRuxGTxfA716eBLZAzgmU+QLBcQaI= =s1rb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] Add support for USB OTG on STM32F7 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:50:10 +0300 Message-ID: <87vajllx8t.fsf@linux.intel.com> References: <1503930018-536-1-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <878tgim24i.fsf@linux.intel.com> <04a49088-b615-d7b8-0387-e7bfa32ee19f@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6999587004264812452==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <04a49088-b615-d7b8-0387-e7bfa32ee19f@st.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Alexandre Torgue , Amelie Delaunay , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Maxime Coquelin , John Youn Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Benjamin Gaignard List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --===============6999587004264812452== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Alexandre Torgue writes: > Hi Felip > > On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> Amelie Delaunay writes: >>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB >>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its >>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI p= hy >>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy. >>> >>> Amelie Delaunay (7): >>> dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding >>> usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS >>> ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU >>=20 >> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems >> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers. >>=20 > > I will take other DT patches in my PR. > > Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch= =20 > I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32=20 > pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to=20 > define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT=20 > patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue. > It is possible that I take also this one ? In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack: Acked-by: Felipe Balbi I'll drop them from my tree now =2D-=20 balbi --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEElLzh7wn96CXwjh2IzL64meEamQYFAlneBXIACgkQzL64meEa mQZmqhAA1qFxb9/dvSAfQ5oXcSSAq5wpeVNcTvkGmG68m4+BnbIMq/J2oPdx4MdX AIiVL6DxeyPJP7ldfdlbz6RmwoVdhi9fYhLiMxWH/n4gtsXKLo8O+OeXcQvj167h qJkY5ilDakMln5hdsZJywpNaAWlzPb8EV+jZ8ELUHXPVyKpMbvndZwPkNoiHl/79 E+W1pYa0klJbI9JcysPXeTd25SLrKDY5AirxxfxKJfJEAbuVl+2okIZu7vE23KIs uPubwkVk1bPVdof1P88LLfkU+hzBkDo3ZVokx0EiNQtnjrAlyDUFd2bYxpbqxCR9 /VVabCHQi72iC5XOlYAw6XJ7S6qQ21ROlIA5IWdoHyStNYeSGQaqHqRylMTZE9/a HsyLtqKeQuCiBxMag82nMLVpC/25j7HqORg6o3+ckqcfQ+HwrR5WPaSTXDtNtmxy MFZRMK3fc/YMq0TJRqeAqo71F7xYgVQqB2PjkVT+LRQezflUFimjrf12MCv8FZ89 8QouguQlHat7/1u1LjWWGNglXwLO5x932lhgFK8FFbWDLrAPhzZ+TRheYErDqfWQ 9GSsNgJDqH6GcC+kxocQF6TKmX9hmRbkarqFFaQs4LL7QHWQsRXcTaAF2qaG/l2z X4BK1BEJwLZe+QW598rWdVvRuxGTxfA716eBLZAzgmU+QLBcQaI= =s1rb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============6999587004264812452== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============6999587004264812452==-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:50:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCHv2 0/7] Add support for USB OTG on STM32F7 In-Reply-To: <04a49088-b615-d7b8-0387-e7bfa32ee19f@st.com> References: <1503930018-536-1-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <878tgim24i.fsf@linux.intel.com> <04a49088-b615-d7b8-0387-e7bfa32ee19f@st.com> Message-ID: <87vajllx8t.fsf@linux.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, Alexandre Torgue writes: > Hi Felip > > On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Amelie Delaunay writes: >>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB >>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its >>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI phy >>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy. >>> >>> Amelie Delaunay (7): >>> dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding >>> usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS >>> ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU >> >> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems >> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers. >> > > I will take other DT patches in my PR. > > Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch > I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32 > pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to > define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT > patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue. > It is possible that I take also this one ? In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack: Acked-by: Felipe Balbi I'll drop them from my tree now -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: not available URL: