From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753282AbdIFWQv (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:16:51 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:17969 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752315AbdIFWQu (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:16:50 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,355,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="897794027" From: Andi Kleen To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Brian Gerst , Andrew Cooper , Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , Kees Cook Subject: Re: [RFC 00/17] Pile o' entry stack changes References: Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 15:16:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Andy Lutomirski's message of "Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:36:45 -0700") Message-ID: <87vakvpj5b.fsf@firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andy Lutomirski writes: > > - Lots of people (Linus included) have asked to convert the entry > code to pop registers on exit instead of movqing them off the > stack. This makes a bunch of progress in that direction. You should benchmark it on Atoms. Likely it's a regression there because they don't have the special PUSH/POP acceleration. -Andi