From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kuninori Morimoto Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 03:33:38 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH][resend] of: Add vendor 2nd prefix for Asahi Kasei Corp Message-Id: <87vbmjhj00.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> List-Id: References: <5398A53D.3020706@wwwdotorg.org> <20140611190444.GN5099@sirena.org.uk> <5398AB07.4040304@wwwdotorg.org> <87sinbdk44.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <878ulzx6hr.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <20140922130026.GK3290@leverpostej> <20140922132743.GM3290@leverpostej> <87y4rfhmgl.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <1415845309.4269.6.camel@perches.com> <20141113025105.GA16652@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20141113025105.GA16652@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Simon Horman Cc: Joe Perches , Mark Rutland , Geert Uytterhoeven , Kuninori Morimoto , Olof Johansson , Stephen Warren , Rob Herring , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Brown , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , ALSA Development Mailing List , Linux-sh list , Magnus , "grant.likely@linaro.org" Hi Joe, Simon > > > I guess removing "ak" line from vendor-prefixes.txt is very enough > > > for warn for a deprecated vendor prefix on checkpatch ? > > > > Huh? No idea what you mean. > > What are you suggesting about checkpatch? > > Hi Joe, > > I think that what Morimoto-san wanted to say was something like this: > > I guess that removing the "ak" line from vendor-prefixes.txt would > be sufficient to cause checkpatch to generate a warning about > using the deprecated "ak" vendor prefix. Is that a good approach? Yes, this is. Thank you Simon, Sorry Joe.