Re: ath11k: incorrect board_id retrieval

[Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>]

Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> writes:

> On Friday, 26 November 2021 15:48:17 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> [...]
>> * 8devices Pineapple
>>   - 2GHz: 160 (0xa0)
>>   - 5GHz: 161 (0xa1)
>>   - 6GHz: 162 (0xa2)
>> * Compex WLE3000H5
>> * (maybe there is not a single one which works?)
>> 
>> If I would use these boards in one with a devicetree then I could just 
>> overwrite it using qcom,board_id (and/or qcom,ath11k-calibration-variant). But 
>> this isn't the case when I want to use a couple of these cards in a simple x86 
>> system. All off them (even when they are significantly different) are reported
>> as
>> 
>>     ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: chip_id 0x0 chip_family 0x0 board_id 0xff soc_id 0xffffffff
>
> I've send my 6GHz modules back to 8devices. They told me that this problem was 
> identified and fixed in their calibration process. I've just got them back 
> from them and now I see following reported by ath11k:
>
>     ath11k_pci 0000:03:00.0: chip_id 0x0 chip_family 0x0 board_id 0xa2 soc_id 0xffffffff
>
> So it is definitely not a firmware problem and it should be fixed by the 
> manufacturers (similar to what 8devices did).

So the device is working fine now?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

-- 
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k