All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "jonathan . albrecht" <jonathan.albrecht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL/SIGFPE/SIGTRAP psw.addr reporting
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 11:27:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnq5i00a.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3624d483-dd11-6464-bbfd-ed2921b2fcfe@vivier.eu>

On Fri, Jul 02 2021, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> wrote:

> Le 02/07/2021 à 12:34, Cornelia Huck a écrit :
>> On Wed, Jun 23 2021, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> qemu-s390x puts a wrong value into SIGILL's siginfo_t's psw.addr: it
>>> should be a pointer to the instruction following the illegal
>>> instruction, but at the moment it is a pointer to the illegal
>>> instruction itself. This breaks OpenJDK, which relies on this value.
>>> A similar problem exists for SIGFPE and SIGTRAP.
>>>
>>> Patch 1 fixes the issue, patch 2 adds a test.
>>>
>>> v1: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg06592.html
>>> v1 -> v2: Use a better buglink (Cornelia), simplify the inline asm
>>>           magic in the test and add an explanation (David).
>>>
>>> v2: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg06649.html
>>> v2 -> v3: Fix SIGSEGV handling (found when trying to run valgrind under
>>>           qemu-user).
>>>
>>> v3: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-06/msg00299.html
>>> v3 -> v4: Fix compiling the test on Ubuntu 20.04 (Jonathan).
>>>
>>> v4: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-06/msg05848.html
>>> v4 -> v5: Greatly simplify the fix (Ulrich).
>>>
>>> Note: the compare-and-trap SIGFPE issue is being fixed separately.
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-06/msg05690.html
>>>
>>> Ilya Leoshkevich (2):
>>>   target/s390x: Fix SIGILL/SIGFPE/SIGTRAP psw.addr reporting
>>>   tests/tcg/s390x: Test SIGILL and SIGSEGV handling
>>>
>>>  linux-user/s390x/cpu_loop.c     |   5 +
>>>  tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target |   1 +
>>>  tests/tcg/s390x/signal.c        | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 tests/tcg/s390x/signal.c
>> 
>> What's the status of this and
>> <20210621141452.2045-1-jonathan.albrecht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>? linux-user
>> is not really my turf, but it would be sad if this fell through the
>> cracks.
>> 
>
> If from the S390x point of view they are correct, I can collect them via linux-user.

Thanks!

Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-05  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-23  2:32 [PATCH v5 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL/SIGFPE/SIGTRAP psw.addr reporting Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-06-23  2:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-07-05  9:36   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-05 17:24     ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-07-05 19:18       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-05 20:19         ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-07-06  9:15           ` Ulrich Weigand
2021-06-23  2:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] tests/tcg/s390x: Test SIGILL and SIGSEGV handling Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-06-23  2:42 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL/SIGFPE/SIGTRAP psw.addr reporting no-reply
2021-07-02 10:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-02 12:01   ` Laurent Vivier
2021-07-02 21:00     ` Ulrich Weigand
2021-07-05  9:27     ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-07-12 14:59     ` jonathan.albrecht
2021-07-12 21:22       ` Ilya Leoshkevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wnq5i00a.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jonathan.albrecht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=krebbel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.