From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691A7C2B9F4 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB6861042 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229812AbhFVJLM (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 05:11:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56242 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229668AbhFVJLL (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 05:11:11 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A05C061574 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 02:08:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1624352924; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CpVayGWDD5jCjOsDFgbodGAhFkKfuv5XGWD7w7SebTM=; b=2R1/CleI7KOMUBqtuusPHNeBMyB6LQW23QPGGjCQZvQ0Gu1F5g27502eLEXYsIptF0rt2a wFXNgg3XyBG6ewdHMW1VmxCc3MGP0g7PgSqc24FhbZE4sEL0qHwmNZxbkV3e19pF+jZNQQ ZVL9VeYqf9YFoxGChCOYTmoaynoFcIkfaQYp2RRSuG2XU8bSo5vhhzMGYPjwLkoWk60cuW 505IOY8i6xYQWJurLi5DhjnRL33vp7xdu9IhaISgVmewqkYkLjA2uFszN/E3EGEE4y/h9d 2fs4u9TpFNBtvW0bxQV+WKLDxjJ6ohry5GsNzc4I/Ernfr0GnALVnaGSuf9SlA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1624352924; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CpVayGWDD5jCjOsDFgbodGAhFkKfuv5XGWD7w7SebTM=; b=kqPPEE7X6YDcM7f4Bc1ElGjkw5V0cvl+ZcwqnvLAfjy3YlwWAhRzZff+Y52vnYnYgjfvjL s2+Xj7eFKHetLXAg== To: Oliver Sang Cc: LKML , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , "Yu\, Fenghua" , "Luck\, Tony" , "Yu\, Yu-cheng" , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , Kan Liang , "Li\, Aubrey" , "Xing\, Zhengjun" , "Tang\, Feng" , "Liu\, Yujie" , "Si\, Beibei" , "Li\, Philip" , "Du\, Julie" Subject: Re: [patch V3 00/66] x86/fpu: Spring cleaning and PKRU sanitizing In-Reply-To: <20210622015937.GB687@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> References: <20210618141823.161158090@linutronix.de> <20210622015937.GB687@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:08:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87wnqme06c.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oliver, On Tue, Jun 22 2021 at 09:59, Oliver Sang wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:18:23PM +0800, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git x86/fpu > > 0-Day kernel CI tested this branch from performance view, > choosing some sub-tests from will-it-scale (detail as below), since we > thought if the branch has the impact of fpu ops, will-it-scale should be > able to catch it. > we also plan to add stress-ng for new round test. > could you suggest if any other suitable test suites? and what's the most > proper sub-tests in will-it-scale and stress-ng? Hard to tell. Anything scheduling heavy will exercise these code paths. Thanks, tglx