All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: imre.deak@intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: do full backlight setup at enable time
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:43:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqkb7d3o.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384365232.25182.90.camel@intelbox>

On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 16:49 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> We should now have all the information we need to do a full
>> initialization of the backlight registers.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c |  145 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>  1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
>> index 0e8f0a3..da088e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
>> @@ -719,50 +719,71 @@ static void pch_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
>>  	enum pipe pipe = intel_get_pipe_from_connector(connector);
>>  	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder =
>>  		intel_pipe_to_cpu_transcoder(dev_priv, pipe);
>> -	u32 tmp;
>> -
>> -	tmp = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL2);
>> +	u32 cpu_ctl2, pch_ctl1, pch_ctl2;
>>  
>> -	/* Note that this can also get called through dpms changes. And
>> -	 * we don't track the backlight dpms state, hence check whether
>> -	 * we have to do anything first. */
>> -	if (tmp & BLM_PWM_ENABLE)
>> -		return;
>> +	cpu_ctl2 = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL2);
>> +	if (cpu_ctl2 & BLM_PWM_ENABLE) {
>> +		WARN(1, "cpu backlight already enabled\n");
>> +		cpu_ctl2 &= ~BLM_PWM_ENABLE;
>> +		I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL2, cpu_ctl2);
>> +	}
>>  
>> -	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->num_pipes == 3)
>> -		tmp &= ~BLM_PIPE_SELECT_IVB;
>> -	else
>> -		tmp &= ~BLM_PIPE_SELECT;
>> +	pch_ctl1 = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1);
>> +	if (pch_ctl1 & BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE) {
>> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("pch backlight already enabled\n");
>> +		pch_ctl1 &= ~BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE;
>> +		I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1, pch_ctl1);
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	if (cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_EDP)
>> -		tmp |= BLM_TRANSCODER_EDP;
>> +		cpu_ctl2 = BLM_TRANSCODER_EDP;
>>  	else
>> -		tmp |= BLM_PIPE(cpu_transcoder);
>> -	tmp &= ~BLM_PWM_ENABLE;
>> -
>> -	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL2, tmp);
>> +		cpu_ctl2 = BLM_PIPE(cpu_transcoder);
>> +	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL2, cpu_ctl2);
>>  	POSTING_READ(BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL2);
>> -	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL2, tmp | BLM_PWM_ENABLE);
>> -
>> -	if (!(dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_NO_PCH_PWM_ENABLE)) {
>> -		tmp = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1);
>> -		tmp |= BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE;
>> -		tmp &= ~BLM_PCH_OVERRIDE_ENABLE;
>> -		I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1, tmp);
>> -	}
>
> Like in the previous patch, why is this removed? If the w/a is not
> needed any more it should be a separate patch.

As I said, I think the quirk is bogus. With the full backlight setup at
enable, we shouldn't trust this to have been set by the BIOS. Again, it
is required to be enabled, even on the machines that supposedly need the
quirk.

I expect the new enable sequence to tackle the problems. And any fallout
we should fix properly, without quirks - and with this series we are
much more flexible to adjust the sequence on a per platform basis. For
example, I was able to test on an IVB that we can't set the backlight
duty cycle until the cpu pwm has been enabled (hence the comment
below). But we do it the before the pch pwm enable.

All that said, maybe it should be a separate patch.


BR,
Jani.

>
>> +	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL2, cpu_ctl2 | BLM_PWM_ENABLE);
>>  
>> -	/*
>> -	 * Call below after setting BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL2 and BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1.
>> -	 * BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL may be cleared to zero automatically when these
>> -	 * registers are set.
>> -	 */
>> +	/* This won't stick until the above enable. */
>>  	intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, panel->backlight.level);
>> +
>> +	pch_ctl2 = panel->backlight.max << 16;
>> +	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL2, pch_ctl2);
>> +
>> +	pch_ctl1 = 0;
>> +	if (panel->backlight.active_low_pwm)
>> +		pch_ctl1 |= BLM_PCH_POLARITY;
>> +	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1, pch_ctl1);
>> +	POSTING_READ(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1);
>> +	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1, pch_ctl1 | BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void i9xx_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
>>  {
>> +	struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
>> +	u32 ctl, freq;
>>  
>> +	ctl = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL);
>> +	if (ctl & BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK_PNV) {
>> +		WARN(1, "backlight already enabled\n");
>> +		I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CTL, 0);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	freq = panel->backlight.max;
>> +	if (panel->backlight.combination_mode)
>> +		freq /= 0xff;
>> +
>> +	ctl = freq << 17;
>> +	if (IS_GEN2(dev) && panel->backlight.combination_mode)
>> +		ctl |= BLM_LEGACY_MODE;
>> +	if (IS_PINEVIEW(dev) && panel->backlight.active_low_pwm)
>> +		ctl |= BLM_POLARITY_PNV;
>> +
>> +	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CTL, ctl);
>> +	POSTING_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL);
>> +
>> +	/* XXX: combine this into above write? */
>>  	intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, panel->backlight.level);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -772,25 +793,33 @@ static void i965_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
>>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
>>  	enum pipe pipe = intel_get_pipe_from_connector(connector);
>> -	u32 tmp;
>> -
>> -	tmp = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL2);
>> +	u32 ctl, ctl2, freq;
>>  
>> -	/* Note that this can also get called through dpms changes. And
>> -	 * we don't track the backlight dpms state, hence check whether
>> -	 * we have to do anything first. */
>> -	if (tmp & BLM_PWM_ENABLE)
>> -		return;
>> +	ctl2 = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL2);
>> +	if (ctl2 & BLM_PWM_ENABLE) {
>> +		WARN(1, "backlight already enabled\n");
>> +		ctl2 &= ~BLM_PWM_ENABLE;
>> +		I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CTL2, ctl2);
>> +	}
>>  
>> -	tmp &= ~BLM_PIPE_SELECT;
>> -	tmp |= BLM_PIPE(pipe);
>> -	tmp &= ~BLM_PWM_ENABLE;
>> +	freq = panel->backlight.max;
>> +	if (panel->backlight.combination_mode)
>> +		freq /= 0xff;
>>  
>> -	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CTL2, tmp);
>> -	POSTING_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL2);
>> -	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CTL2, tmp | BLM_PWM_ENABLE);
>> +	ctl = freq << 16;
>> +	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CTL, ctl);
>>  
>> +	/* XXX: combine this into above write? */
>>  	intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, panel->backlight.level);
>> +
>> +	ctl2 = BLM_PIPE(pipe);
>> +	if (panel->backlight.combination_mode)
>> +		ctl2 |= BLM_COMBINATION_MODE;
>> +	if (panel->backlight.active_low_pwm)
>> +		ctl2 |= BLM_POLARITY_I965;
>> +	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CTL2, ctl2);
>> +	POSTING_READ(BLC_PWM_CTL2);
>> +	I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_CTL2, ctl2 | BLM_PWM_ENABLE);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void vlv_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
>> @@ -799,23 +828,27 @@ static void vlv_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
>>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
>>  	enum pipe pipe = intel_get_pipe_from_connector(connector);
>> -	u32 tmp;
>> +	u32 ctl, ctl2;
>>  
>> -	tmp = I915_READ(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe));
>> +	ctl2 = I915_READ(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe));
>> +	if (ctl2 & BLM_PWM_ENABLE) {
>> +		WARN(1, "backlight already enabled\n");
>> +		ctl2 &= ~BLM_PWM_ENABLE;
>> +		I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe), ctl2);
>> +	}
>>  
>> -	/* Note that this can also get called through dpms changes. And
>> -	 * we don't track the backlight dpms state, hence check whether
>> -	 * we have to do anything first. */
>> -	if (tmp & BLM_PWM_ENABLE)
>> -		return;
>> +	ctl = panel->backlight.max << 16;
>> +	I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL(pipe), ctl);
>>  
>> -	tmp &= ~BLM_PWM_ENABLE;
>> +	/* XXX: combine this into above write? */
>> +	intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, panel->backlight.level);
>>  
>> -	I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe), tmp);
>> +	ctl2 = 0;
>> +	if (panel->backlight.active_low_pwm)
>> +		ctl2 |= BLM_POLARITY_I965;
>> +	I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe), ctl2);
>>  	POSTING_READ(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe));
>> -	I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe), tmp | BLM_PWM_ENABLE);
>> -
>> -	intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, panel->backlight.level);
>> +	I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe), ctl2 | BLM_PWM_ENABLE);
>>  }
>>  
>>  void intel_panel_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-14  5:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-08 14:48 [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915: backlight rewrite Jani Nikula
2013-11-08 14:48 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: clean up backlight conditional build Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 21:23   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-08 14:48 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: make backlight info per-connector Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 21:29   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-08 14:48 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: make asle notifications update backlight on all connectors Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 21:29   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-08 14:48 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: handle backlight through chip specific functions Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 21:36   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-12 23:19     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-11-08 14:48 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: fix gen2-gen3 backlight set Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 22:00   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-13  8:27     ` Jani Nikula
2013-11-13  9:04       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-11-13  9:12       ` Imre Deak
2013-11-08 14:48 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: vlv does not have pipe field in backlight registers Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 22:00   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-08 14:48 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: move backlight level setting in enable/disable to hooks Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 22:01   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-08 14:49 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: use the initialized backlight max value instead of reading it Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 22:42   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-13  8:39     ` Jani Nikula
2013-11-13  9:12       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-11-08 14:49 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: debug print on backlight register Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 22:48   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-13 10:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-11-08 14:49 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: gather backlight information at setup Jani Nikula
2013-11-13 17:01   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-14  5:19     ` Jani Nikula
2013-11-14  8:22       ` Imre Deak
2013-11-08 14:49 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: do full backlight setup at enable time Jani Nikula
2013-11-13 17:53   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-14  5:43     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2013-11-14  8:27       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-11-14  8:28       ` Imre Deak
2013-11-14 10:13   ` [PATCH v2 " Jani Nikula
2013-11-14 10:46     ` Imre Deak
2013-11-14 10:14   ` [PATCH 11.5/13] drm/i915: remove QUIRK_NO_PCH_PWM_ENABLE Jani Nikula
2013-11-14 10:50     ` Imre Deak
2013-11-08 14:49 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: nuke get max backlight functions Jani Nikula
2013-11-13 17:54   ` Imre Deak
2013-11-08 14:49 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: do not save/restore backlight registers Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 23:25   ` Daniel Vetter
2013-11-13  8:40     ` Jani Nikula
2013-11-13 10:56     ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915: do not save/restore backlight registers in KMS Jani Nikula
2013-11-13 18:05       ` Imre Deak
2013-11-14 11:22         ` Daniel Vetter
2013-11-11  8:36 ` [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915: backlight rewrite Jani Nikula
2013-11-12 21:22 ` Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wqkb7d3o.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.