From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CADA8C4345F for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxptC-0003Py-Ny; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:10:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxpt4-0003N3-PB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:10:51 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxpss-0000Fz-2i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:10:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1713539436; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=797g1e+/d8qvTxCJqjjsQP4+vz2jNRk3dmP0OYu0HUI=; b=Fh8YUgrnZqVFMNjtm1OKALcybu2bs7uYIEsxq3ROImO2kbI0/FjKdKgUapcBsLK+ok56zR uKFSoEhKqzm7ze48nzn26LzOJxjtEGXdrB7xg/FIU9/DvsWiI99qMKzkCvGJPGcTD+hEqf c7WdQgIcjAVtOAUJNwAS9SBJ/KvK3gI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-26-LDBTb6T1P32lC1kWKApHzA-1; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:10:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LDBTb6T1P32lC1kWKApHzA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49C9B8140A8; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.39.192.247]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A05E1C060D0; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2792D21E6811; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:10:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: John Snow , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Victor Toso de Carvalho , Peter Maydell , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Add qapi-domain Sphinx extension In-Reply-To: <87msppl8c8.fsf@pond.sub.org> (Markus Armbruster's message of "Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:45:27 +0200") References: <20240419043820.178731-1-jsnow@redhat.com> <87msppl8c8.fsf@pond.sub.org> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:10:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87y199jsm2.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-2.313, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Markus Armbruster writes: [...] >> The purpose of sending this series in its current form is largely to >> solicit feedback on general aesthetics, layout, and features. Sphinx is >> a wily beast, and feedback at this stage will dictate how and where >> certain features are implemented. > > I'd appreciate help with that. Opinions? Less than clear, let me try again: I'm soliciting opinions on the new look. Check it out... [...] >> This RFC series includes a "sandbox" .rst document that showcases the >> features of this domain by writing QAPI directives by hand; this >> document will be removed from the series before final inclusion. It's >> here to serve as a convenient test-bed for y'all to give feedback. ... here: >> All that said, here's the sandbox document fully rendered: >> https://jsnow.gitlab.io/qemu/qapi/index.html >> >> And here's the new QAPI index page created by that sandbox document: >> https://jsnow.gitlab.io/qemu/qapi-index.html [...]