All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Het Gala <het.gala@nutanix.com>,
	 qemu-devel@nongnu.org, prerna.saxena@nutanix.com,
	 quintela@redhat.com,  berrange@redhat.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org,  farosas@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] migration: Plug memory leak with migration URIs
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 07:19:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y1ee1m2m.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWjfnIjec3udUZZ-@x1n> (Peter Xu's message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2023 14:16:44 -0500")

Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 07:35:43PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 08:43:01PM +0000, Het Gala wrote:
>> >> migrate_uri_parse() allocates memory to 'channel' if the user
>> >> opts for old syntax - uri, which is leaked because there is no
>> >> code for freeing 'channel'.
>> >> So, free channel to avoid memory leak in case where 'channels'
>> >> is empty and uri parsing is required.
>> >> 
>> >> Fixes: 5994024f ("migration: Implement MigrateChannelList to qmp migration flow")
>> >> Signed-off-by: Het Gala <het.gala@nutanix.com>
>> >> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>> >
>> >> @@ -533,18 +533,18 @@ static void qemu_start_incoming_migration(const char *uri, bool has_channels,
      -    MigrationChannel *channel = NULL;
      +    g_autoptr(MigrationChannel) channel = NULL;
           MigrationAddress *addr = NULL;
           MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();

           /*
            * Having preliminary checks for uri and channel
            */
           if (uri && has_channels) {
               error_setg(errp, "'uri' and 'channels' arguments are mutually "
                          "exclusive; exactly one of the two should be present in "
                          "'migrate-incoming' qmp command ");
               return;
           } else if (channels) {
               /* To verify that Migrate channel list has only item */
               if (channels->next) {
>> >>              error_setg(errp, "Channel list has more than one entries");
>> >>              return;
>> >>          }
>> >> -        channel = channels->value;
>> >> +        addr = channels->value->addr;
>> >>      } else if (uri) {
>> >>          /* caller uses the old URI syntax */
>> >>          if (!migrate_uri_parse(uri, &channel, errp)) {
>> >>              return;
>> >>          }
>> >> +        addr = channel->addr;
>> >>      } else {
>> >>          error_setg(errp, "neither 'uri' or 'channels' argument are "
>> >>                     "specified in 'migrate-incoming' qmp command ");
>> >>          return;
>> >>      }
>> >> -    addr = channel->addr;
>> >
>> > Why these "addr" lines need change?  Won't that behave the same as before?
>> 
>> In the first case, @channel is now null.  If we left the assignment to
>> @addr alone, it would crash.  Clearer now?
>
> Is it this one?
>
>     if (uri && has_channels) {
>         error_setg(errp, "'uri' and 'channels' arguments are mutually "
>                    "exclusive; exactly one of the two should be present in "
>                    "'migrate-incoming' qmp command ");
>         return;
>     }
>
> It returns already?

I meant the first visible case, i.e. if (channels).  Sorry for being
less than clear!

The problem is to free the result of migrate_uri_parse().

The patch's solution is to use @channel *only* for holding that result,
so it can be g_autoptr: drop channel = channels->value from the if
(channels) conditional.

Since this breaks addr = channel->addr, we move that assignment into the
conditionals that reach it, which lets us unbreak it the if (channels)
one.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-01  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-29 20:43 [PATCH v4] migration: Plug memory leak with migration URIs Het Gala
2023-11-30  7:21 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-11-30 17:29 ` Peter Xu
2023-11-30 18:35   ` Markus Armbruster
2023-11-30 19:16     ` Peter Xu
2023-12-01  6:19       ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2023-12-01 15:29         ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y1ee1m2m.fsf@pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=het.gala@nutanix.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=prerna.saxena@nutanix.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.