From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F081FC433EF for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 09:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9021342589; Thu, 26 May 2022 09:50:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id luaZ2Kz8F2Hx; Thu, 26 May 2022 09:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666F3424ED; Thu, 26 May 2022 09:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A486A1BF487 for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 09:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C714118E for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 09:49:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nWsQm-R_pY0Q for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 09:49:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net (relay11.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::231]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9D141188 for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 09:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: peter@korsgaard.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7713E100006; Thu, 26 May 2022 09:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peko by dell.be.48ers.dk with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nuA7u-00HNiJ-Jr; Thu, 26 May 2022 11:49:54 +0200 From: Peter Korsgaard To: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot References: <20220419213450.887728-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20220419213450.887728-3-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <22e590f7-80a4-0e7f-9b36-33f6d0e6ddae@gmail.com> <20220518233502.5237d35d@windsurf> Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 11:49:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220518233502.5237d35d@windsurf> (Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot's message of "Wed, 18 May 2022 23:35:02 +0200") Message-ID: <87y1yopqrh.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/5] arch/Config.in.arm: re-organize MMU selection X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Romain Naour , James Hilliard , Thomas Petazzoni Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot writes: > On Wed, 18 May 2022 22:24:28 +0200 > Romain Naour wrote: >> > In practice, MMU-capable ARM cores are always used with their MMU >> > enabled, so it doesn't make sense to support the use case of not using >> > the MMU on such cores. >> >> So, it means that we can remove qemu_arm_versatile_nommu_defconfig since >> BR2_arm926t -> BR2_ARM_CPU_ARMV5 -> BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY > Yes. I don't think supporting ARMv5 noMMU makes much sense, as > explained in the commit log. Supporting ARMv7-M definitely makes sense, > but not ARMv5 noMMU. So what do we about the test coverage from qemu_arm_versatile_nommu_defconfig? Does QEMU emulate any ARMv7-M platforms we could use instead? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot