From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21089C432BE for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 12:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EE06101B for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 12:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229816AbhHaMVK (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:21:10 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:58354 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231524AbhHaMVK (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:21:10 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1630412414; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dLfh9JxjVsFJMEqDqI1wU0uUhzFLM1C98XY5fxI0HAw=; b=N/yy/WYoEI448fGxe26ycko7XHo8uM42egNOoWIezev23wyINJWmYtAVKi+VzAPBwRhpZq lRRvXh6/dat9ehKjyoNebNPQpoUJbcXMhVF+ByQMVpHnAPXZ+hzmqhvq5/9P9e1M8saU68 IaYlINVn9+0GFKBtM4Iz+J911FmVlwyx36z2l0U2RmXyYHqYsPXsJ1HZJ9eLtWgLVgdwhG bnrzJtYaAZZw5kYawLThJ8kEUbsBVK/8iZZ/NhEIrYSIWd05o7fiLA9nINWLqB+dh33c8f i34xLIxKf7U5vdabeUcoYnTAOZJ+LiJDsnM+ovtXDXT6jR2ssVsoy3rYEEti3A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1630412414; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dLfh9JxjVsFJMEqDqI1wU0uUhzFLM1C98XY5fxI0HAw=; b=CNwUL1jjmzQ4Uf5vibymfJlFzgyn7labFozYoYdfH4pg2kpyJt1VQn4smAE3m1tkmxlAZ1 V5qY0WImK8d45NAA== To: Hanjun Guo , Guenter Roeck , Xiaoming Ni Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, wangle6@huawei.com, xiaoqian9@huawei.com, shaolexi@huawei.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , Xiongfeng Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH] semaphore: Add might_sleep() to down_*() family In-Reply-To: <9471f03d-942d-2143-5d87-8ec98bc38ec3@huawei.com> References: <20210809021215.19991-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com> <20210831111322.GA1687117@roeck-us.net> <9471f03d-942d-2143-5d87-8ec98bc38ec3@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:20:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87y28hdcw2.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 31 2021 at 19:39, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2021/8/31 19:13, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> This patch results in the following traceback on all arm64 boots with >> EFI BIOS. >> >> The problem is only seen with CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT=y, and thus only on arm64. > > I Cced Xiongfeng, he sent a patch to fix this issue over a month ago: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210720112635.38565-1-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com/T/ OMG. None of this is necessary.