From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 20:27:02 +0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/netperf: move SITE so s.b.n In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <87y2bsrxcp.fsf@tarshish> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Arnout, On Tue, Jun 01 2021, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > On 27/05/2021 14:50, Baruch Siach wrote: >> The original site is gone. >> >> Fixes: >> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/8d4a2ef5a7f50ea21b844d6cf806bb83016ae17b/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach >> --- >> package/netperf/netperf.mk | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/package/netperf/netperf.mk b/package/netperf/netperf.mk >> index 8b2280830f3c..0c423249c4c9 100644 >> --- a/package/netperf/netperf.mk >> +++ b/package/netperf/netperf.mk >> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ >> ################################################################################ >> >> NETPERF_VERSION = 2.7.0 >> -NETPERF_SITE = ftp://ftp.netperf.org/netperf >> +NETPERF_SITE = http://sources.buildroot.net/netperf > > I believe upstream moved to https://hewlettpackard.github.io/netperf/ > > That one *does* have a configure script. Still need to check if the tarball has > the same contents though. The hash doesn't match, that's for sure. So what is the right fix here? The new upstream website does not carry the tarball we use. baruch > > Marked as changes requested. > > Regards, > Arnout > >> NETPERF_SOURCE = netperf-$(NETPERF_VERSION).tar.bz2 >> # gcc 5+ defaults to gnu99 which breaks netperf >> NETPERF_CONF_ENV = \ >> -- ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -