Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] making log --first-parent imply -m

[Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I had no intention to introduce --diff-parents, at least for now, and
>> maybe never. What I said about it was theoretical discussion rather than
>> actual proposal.
>>
>> If we agree on the above, I intended to instead propose something like:
>>
>> --diff-merges=first-parent or just =first
>
> OK, so the combined, combined-dense and split were meant to work
> with all the parents, and off is the only one that means comparison
> with no parents.  That makes sense.

Yeah, exactly, thanks!

The only question regarding it I then have for now is what are
preferences for names selection inside single option? Abbreviated yet
somewhat sensible, or verbose? I mean:

--diff-merges=first vs --diff-merges=first-parent

--diff-merges=comb vs --diff-merges=combined

etc. What's better?

Thanks,
-- Sergey