From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B6EC76188 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 06:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED56E20873 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 06:39:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ED56E20873 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:49806 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoj1Z-0001sH-R3 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 02:39:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoj1R-0001Th-Cw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 02:39:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hoj1Q-0005LX-Kc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 02:39:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hoj1Q-0005Kd-FE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 02:39:08 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 638B230C747A; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 06:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-117-244.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.244]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77BE6012D; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 06:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 487E0113865F; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 08:39:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Stefan Hajnoczi Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 08:39:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87y30t43cp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.46]); Sat, 20 Jul 2019 06:39:06 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] Use of TARGET_FMT_plx in hw/tpm/trace-events X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Berger Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Consider hw/tpm/trace-events # tpm_crb.c tpm_crb_mmio_read(uint64_t addr, unsigned size, uint32_t val) "CRB read 0x" TARGET_FMT_plx " len:%u val: 0x%" PRIx32 tpm_crb_mmio_write(uint64_t addr, unsigned size, uint32_t val) "CRB write 0x" TARGET_FMT_plx " len:%u val: 0x%" PRIx32 Format is TARGET_FMT_plx formats a hwaddr, but the parameter type is uint64_t. They happen to be the same. Is this kosher?