Re: 9984 VHT

["Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>]

Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> writes:

> Am 07.02.2017 um 13:14 schrieb Valo, Kalle:
>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 02/02/2017 10:42 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
>>>> Am 02.02.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Ben Greear:
>>>>
>>>>> I hacked ath10k to enable radar detection on 160Mhz bandwidths. Now hostapd
>>>>> starts.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can reproduce the FW failure. It is because FW 3.3-25 release
>>>>> started asserting
>>>>> if the freq2 was zero in VHT160 mode. It seems to use both freq1
>>>>> and freq2, and not
>>>>> how the driver or linux seems to normally use them.
>>>> its even worse. starting from 3.3 it uses freq2 instead of freq1.
>>>> but i made a patch for it. but it still wont work. vdev_start still
>>>> fails
>>> Well it would have been helpful from the start to have known about this patch.
>>>
>>> Could you post it?
>>>
>>> Kalle: Since the firmware API changed, how do you want to handle
>>> the differences here?
>>
>> The firmware API shouldn't change like that, but if it has I guess a
>> firmware feature flag to enable a workaround in ath10k sounds like the
>> easiest solution.
>
> the more recent firmware have some new wmi services enabled which can
> be used as indicator as well.

I don't know what flag exactly you are referring to, but using a WMI
service flag to detect this is not really reliable. They can be enabled
or disabled between branches, or even between builds.

-- 
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k