From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:21:26 +0300 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Anyone tried using the QCA9880 NIC from the TPLINK AC1750 AP? In-Reply-To: <51CBADFA.4050008@candelatech.com> (Ben Greear's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:14:02 -0700") References: <51CB9100.9090908@candelatech.com> <20939.40669.864384.780283@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <51CBA16E.3090206@candelatech.com> <20939.43650.235001.756470@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <51CBADFA.4050008@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <87y59uitu1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Ben Greear writes: > On 06/26/2013 07:59 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: >> Ben Greear wrote: >>> Excellent! I'll go order some more! Not the most efficient way >>> to get NICs, but it will do for now. >> >> IMO, it's better to wait until the v2.0 cards are available. > > Seems to be a common suggestion! > > I've already got a few v1 APs on order, maybe they will > at least give me something to get started with. > > If you are at liberty to say, what sorts of issues should I > expect with the v1? Or perhaps a better question: How is the > v2 expected to be better? Grep for ATH10K_PCI_FEATURE_HW_1_0_WARKAROUND and you see what workarounds ath10k has for v1. -- Kalle Valo