From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B216C433F5 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12852611C1 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:18:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 12852611C1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF61080BE1; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:18:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PCj7dweRH_GT; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010:104::8cd3:938]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7037C80BB3; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067D5C0012; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2615FC000E for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E4940463 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:18:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.b="r5olXBSm"; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=linutronix.de header.b="B64qHNyB" Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qaSi516EAe0 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:18:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE5C40438 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:18:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1636017504; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1GczxBPQS1aWLkGQ/wyV5Px0pkwVjRf/kfMmmLUyHdQ=; b=r5olXBSmQCbu8oOwspom3OtmhhKCStXJkIlebYFkcAz/rl7xPX0gLZn/wk3WKqvSWMXZSt cnhtY/FoNEVVJ9nU5feJ3eSkJYwOqllYxlA+rEbVl7+w6C8InV3oixjt4IV9Vc+paYf5t1 gwj1jRI1qNN05T4ngu7XEgW+lpVH/nPsroi1dIkYr6jlOHEy6Ob/aSylBaoLjme7Z48RrY MmUpMwRr82oowEJ9DoWbCSp0odgedLjB2ZROE/MLrxDf4SS7m1XyxbrKW7UY0Zsg/xluDw H5of7LxpUkpuq4LsI2xtcdyETXKIR9bRseFzbrCY+VaXFt1K0afeLEbRquMzRw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1636017504; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1GczxBPQS1aWLkGQ/wyV5Px0pkwVjRf/kfMmmLUyHdQ=; b=B64qHNyBpCZ0eJMX9FKx+z6CSX4qAoFkGx1xyuxS/tm4s9yJqopBWFhgrxA2Kt8y/NAShn lBV5YlJ6BO1vOWCw== To: Juergen Gross , X86 ML , Linux Virtualization Subject: Re: Which tree for paravirt related patches? In-Reply-To: <874k8s5lgz.ffs@tglx> References: <60a2037d-2d4d-e9e9-edfd-b889c4bd3fb6@suse.com> <874k8s5lgz.ffs@tglx> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 10:18:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87zgqk46u7.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , IngoMolnar , Borislav Petkov , Jan Beulich X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" On Thu, Nov 04 2021 at 10:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote: CC+ x86, peterz > Juergen, > > On Thu, Nov 04 2021 at 06:53, Juergen Gross wrote: > >> A recent patch modifying the core paravirt-ops functionality is >> highlighting some missing MAINTAINERS information for PARAVIRT_OPS: >> there is no information which tree is to be used for taking those >> patches per default. In the past this was mostly handled by the tip >> tree, and I think this is fine. >> >> X86 maintainers, are you fine with me modifying the PARAVIRT_OPS entry >> to add the x86 ML and the tip tree? This way such patches will be >> noticed by you and can be handled accordingly. > > Sure. > >> An alternative would be to let me carry those patches through the Xen >> tree, but in lots of those patches some core x86 files are being touched >> and I think the tip tree is better suited for paravirt handling. > > Fair enough. > >> And please, could you take a look at: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/b8192e8a-13ef-6ac6-6364-8ba58992cd1d@suse.com/ >> >> This patch was the one making me notice the problem. > > Will do. > > Thanks, > > Thomas _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization