From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBC5C2B9F4 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86D2613BF for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229783AbhFQHRx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:17:53 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:46920 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229515AbhFQHRw (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:17:52 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1623914144; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aZqqfG/eTk866hHwRZlpV3RdZpBCWJ386ibcttBrr1E=; b=K+UHlU0c4oSXoFrwmumGobUlcMgs/WNJoCJle/rMgcM15/d2oIN0VR7aPws1gby+CsxkIj F/jBTLGcgaTvLNeHImWnGjLl3v5hfkhRUKI/ZpUoXeBCKe6wJiUvtYZq+6mNDIaTyXiiTp wFQckO4DrfWzC8yhKKlb/zl1042B3wfaGByGrup7h9VFZ8avAhlsHHgFYjsDUEXXEythqG +CqrpxCcEG4CGdnk1I9Y+udFOAbLFXLfrh+NyLIvlaYz9MmPdpvrH0TMNZOmiPc/xmAAZV UQR8mHUw1lSYTjdjc9qtmsNW3z7+MYLeIJu9lkZNtaM/0IO7xZts3X22aYjaeA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1623914144; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aZqqfG/eTk866hHwRZlpV3RdZpBCWJ386ibcttBrr1E=; b=9qo1p3yVXq5EubqGQFWsRj69tT5N6c495F5UlraGu0DlQRVSwfnHpBwi7QYmy4AfOuSIYF vCy93498oJ94JMAQ== To: "Liang\, Kan" , LKML Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Fenghua Yu , Tony Luck , Yu-cheng Yu , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [patch V2 32/52] x86/fpu/xstate: Sanitize handling of independent features In-Reply-To: <7309d6fa-dd25-ac31-7b05-d88f59d18213@linux.intel.com> References: <20210614154408.673478623@linutronix.de> <20210614155356.961460910@linutronix.de> <7309d6fa-dd25-ac31-7b05-d88f59d18213@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:15:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgvpezbz.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16 2021 at 16:04, Kan Liang wrote: > On 6/14/2021 11:44 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> intel_pmu_store_lbr(cpuc, xsave->lbr.entries); >> } > > I tested the LBR Xsave feature on a Alder Lake machine. It looks good. > > However, when I did other CPU hotplug test, it gave me an Oops. Sigh. Yes. I know where this comes from. Brilliant crap that. Thanks, tglx