From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39337) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPZWn-0001kn-UQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:18:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPZWj-0006QR-Sn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:18:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b]:33549) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dPZWj-0006Pv-K9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:18:25 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id r103so149280966wrb.0 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:18:23 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170621024831.26019-1-rth@twiddle.net> <871sq6y9qh.fsf@linaro.org> <27cf9824-ee96-3a42-eefc-5a082267d708@twiddle.net> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <27cf9824-ee96-3a42-eefc-5a082267d708@twiddle.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 20:19:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87zicuwo9b.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] Cleanups within TCG middle-end List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aurelien@aurel32.net Richard Henderson writes: > On 06/26/2017 09:49 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Hmm it compile tested fine on mine but: >> >> qemu-system-sparc: /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/tcg/tcg.h:725: temp_arg: Assertion `n < tcg_ctx.nb_temps' failed. > > Bah. I fixed this, and then lost it while rebasing. > It's an uninitialized structure member. > >> And also Travis is quite un-happy: >> >> https://travis-ci.org/stsquad/qemu/builds/247099991 > > The only real failure I see in here is also GTESTER for sparc. > Or am I missing something? There is also a compile failure on Travis: https://travis-ci.org/stsquad/qemu/jobs/247099992#L3021 https://travis-ci.org/stsquad/qemu/jobs/247099995#L3020 I hadn't actually clicked through all the failures because I assumed they are mostly the same. I'll re-check on v2 ;-) > > > r~ -- Alex Bennée