From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751110AbdE3PqA (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2017 11:46:00 -0400 Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com ([208.88.110.44]:50928 "EHLO mail.savoirfairelinux.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750950AbdE3Pp6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2017 11:45:58 -0400 From: Vivien Didelot To: Andrew Lunn Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com, "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: dsa: remove useless copy of tagger xmit In-Reply-To: <20170530152943.GH22758@lunn.ch> References: <20170530142131.23568-1-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <20170530142131.23568-7-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <20170530152943.GH22758@lunn.ch> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:43:54 -0400 Message-ID: <87zidu2vut.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew, Andrew Lunn writes: >> /* Transmit function may have to reallocate the original SKB */ >> - nskb = p->xmit(skb, dev); >> + nskb = p->dp->ds->dst->tag_ops->xmit(skb, dev); > > This is also the hot path for DSA transmit. Do we really want to do 4 > extra pointer dereferences a million times per second, compared to one > copy during setup? Yep I get the idea. It felt weird to copy structure members like this and not at least reusing the dsa_device_ops structure. Thanks, Vivien